Glamorgan cricket team

[Trigger]

Are they the FATTEST sporting team to currently grace these shores?...

There's some right BEEFERS on SS1 right now, Cosgrove, Croft, Dalrymple etc... Mind you, those striking red outfits don't do them many favours...

 

[Gwylan]

Are they the FATTEST sporting team to currently grace these shores?...

There's some right BEEFERS on SS1 right now, Cosgrove, Croft, Dalrymple etc... Mind you, those striking red outfits don't do them many favours...

Kent in the early 70s had Cowdrey, Woolmer, Shepherd, Nichols (when Knott was away and Ealham - none of them exactly ectomorphs

 

[Trigger]

The fielding is SHOCKING.

 

[SirDouglasLoft]

Great fielding

 

[Horton's halftime iceberg]

Do they have subsitute fielders and runners to stop boundarys

In Play

Surrey 56/0 (6.4/38 ov)

Glamorgan

Glamorgan won the toss and elected to field

 

[Trigger]

Another shocking piece of fielding PUNISHED by a big SIX.

 

[SirDouglasLoft]

Another shocking piece of fielding PUNISHED by a big SIX.

"very brave from that man in the crowd. Make sure you save yourself first mate"

quality

 

[Trigger]

Cosgrove the TANK on to bowl...

159/0 (17.4)

 

[Flavor Flav]

They have a cracking bowling attack, 240 from 23 overs!

 

[patchamalbion]

they are FAT and SHIT

 

[Barrel of Fun]

This reminds me of a previous encounter between the two sides.

4th Round: Surrey v Glamorgan at The Oval, Jun 19, 2002 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com

Surrey 438/5 (50 overs)

Glamorgan 429ao (49.5 overs)

 

[Trigger]

Ha ha, some of this hapless diving by the rather rotund fielders is hilarious...

I may be slightly chunky but I don't pretend to be a sportsman!

 

[Trigger]

Surrey finish on a rather disappointing 386/3 off their 38 overs against Glamorefoodplease, shame the match was reduced by two overs a side due to the weather or 400 would have been hit!