Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Did you have a 'limited view' QPR seat?











goldstone

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 5, 2003
7,257
Stood, not sat; didn't move; view not as restricted as I expected, but would have been worse sitting down.
 


Is it PotG?

Thrifty non-licker
Feb 20, 2017
27,017
Sussex by the Sea
It was limited in so much as QPR only managed one in reply to our two. Unlucky Wurzel. Was right behind the goal (me, not Wurzel).
 




AmexRuislip

Retired Spy 🕵️‍♂️
Feb 2, 2014
35,757
Ruislip
Was in Y 42/43, sold as restricted view.
Didn't move, tempted though, but just had to move head slightly for bind post action.
Anyway the real action came towards the away support, so no complaints here.
Only a garlic breathing Polish chap next to me :lolol:
 

Attachments

  • 20170407_193643.jpg
    20170407_193643.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 750
Last edited:


One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
24,315
Worthing
Row B - upper tier - 114-116.
Although it stated restricted, it was fine. Leg room abysmal, but already knew that.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 






The Sock of Poskett

The best is yet to come (spoiler alert)
Jun 12, 2009
2,863
Yup, but it was basically fine. Think we were the row in front of our actual seats, as they were occupied by the time we arrived. Twas no big deal [emoji854]
 








Wrong-Direction

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2013
13,817
I ended up in the row in front a few times..

Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here