thedonkeycentrehalf
Retired
- Jul 7, 2003
- 7,510

Coventry given eviction notice from CBS Arena
Coventry City are served with an eviction notice by former Newcastle United owner Mike Ashley's Frasers Group.

Mike Ashley showing his class again.
One could possibly assume that Ashley is interested in buying Coventry City and in some bizarre way this is one way of holding all the cards, at a knocked down price somehow.What's the point of owning a stadium if you have no-one to play in the stadium?
Maybe this is an aggressive re-negotiation tactic.What's the point of owning a stadium if you have no-one to play in the stadium?
What's the point of owning a stadium if you have no-one to play in the stadium?
Harsh considering we don't have all the facts. Maybe Coventry are currently not paying what is considered the market rate?Disgraceful. Ashley just playing games with the new owners to get them to stump up a bigger price for the stadium presumably?
"Frasers do not believe they are bound by the previous licence agreement with the stadium's former owners" - considering the sale only went through three weeks ago, seems very fast to have been through the licence, had discussions and then got hold of an eviction notice.Harsh considering we don't have all the facts. Maybe Coventry are currently not paying what is considered the market rate?
That's all fair enough, but how do we know CCFC haven't been approached about a rent raise and ignorantly dismissed it out of hand - leaving Ashley no alternative? I'm not saying that's what happened, just that the full facts aren't being presented."Frasers do not believe they are bound by the previous licence agreement with the stadium's former owners" - considering the sale only went through three weeks ago, seems very fast to have been through the licence, had discussions and then got hold of an eviction notice.
For someone who says he is a football fan, this is pretty low. I have friends and relatives who are Coventry fans and they really have been through the ringer over the last few years. While they didn't want Ashley involved they were hopeful that he might at least be a useful ally.
"Frasers do not believe they are bound by the previous licence agreement with the stadium's former owners" - considering the sale only went through three weeks ago, seems very fast to have been through the licence, had discussions and then got hold of an eviction notice.
For someone who says he is a football fan, this is pretty low. I have friends and relatives who are Coventry fans and they really have been through the ringer over the last few years. While they didn't want Ashley involved they were hopeful that he might at least be a useful ally.
Either - a massive Sports Direct superstore or more likely housing.What's the point of owning a stadium if you have no-one to play in the stadium?