Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Cricket] England vs Australia Third Ashes Test - Leeds 22nd-26th August 2019







Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
Well there wouldn't have been 20-20 games, and maybe there were fewer one day games, so did we play tests against them more often than once every two years?

I think, without googling there were times we didn't play each other for three or four years, it's all become a bit Ryder Cup.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,200
Goldstone
I'm not sure that it was created by the English. It was some young Australian women who presented it (and, as I said, Bligh married one of them). Why Aussie women did this, I've no idea.
Oh ok.
And the urn itself was not presented to England but to Bligh personally.
That's odd. Surely it was to be a trophy for the winning team, presented to the winning captain (like any other trophy in team sport), but you wouldn't expect the captain to take ownership of it.
 










Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,339
Uffern
Well there wouldn't have been 20-20 games, and maybe there were fewer one day games, so did we play tests against them more often than once every two years?

It seems everything is ironed out nowadays. I remember six tests series between us and the Sandpaper merchants and I believe the WIndies.

Yes, the aforementioned 79/80 series was just after the 78/79 series. Australia played both England and the Windies over 6 tests, They played two series in successive years as the Packer players had returned to the fold. That's why England won 5-1 in 78/79 and lost 3-0 a year later - having Lillee, Thomson, Chappell and Marsh back made a difference ... who knew?

You can tell that one of my specialist subjects for Mastermind was The Ashes ... I wasn't allowed to choose it though
 




Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
11,825
Cumbria
Was that something to do with Packer?

No, Packer had nothing to do with or influenced anything to do with the Ashes.

Yes, the aforementioned 79/80 series was just after the 78/79 series. Australia played both England and the Windies over 6 tests, They played two series in successive years as the Packer players had returned to the fold. That's why England won 5-1 in 78/79 and lost 3-0 a year later - having Lillee, Thomson, Chappell and Marsh back made a difference ... who knew?

You can tell that one of my specialist subjects for Mastermind was The Ashes ... I wasn't allowed to choose it though

Aha - that was it - it was some hastily arranged thing wasn't it, after the deal with Packer. So wasn't really thought of as fully 'official' in terms of the Ashes.
 


Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
Yes, the aforementioned 79/80 series was just after the 78/79 series. Australia played both England and the Windies over 6 tests, They played two series in successive years as the Packer players had returned to the fold. That's why England won 5-1 in 78/79 and lost 3-0 a year later - having Lillee, Thomson, Chappell and Marsh back made a difference ... who knew?

You can tell that one of my specialist subjects for Mastermind was The Ashes ... I wasn't allowed to choose it though

The obvious retort, you were on Mastermind?
 






Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,339
Uffern
The obvious retort, you were on Mastermind?

I was ... but did really badly,

I replaced the Ashes with the history of Sussex cricket but it was my second subject and didn't get past the first round.

Thankfully it was long ago and only El Presidente, who was in the audience, will remember my failure
 


Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
I was ... but did really badly,

I replaced the Ashes with the history of Sussex cricket but it was my second subject and didn't get past the first round.

Thankfully it was long ago and only El Presidente, who was in the audience, will remember my failure

Still an excellent effort to be on there. I commend you whole heartedly.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,200
Goldstone
It's a bit weird really, if the two teams are playing for the ashes of English cricket, which died at The Oval.
Just reading some wiki, and although the term was first coined as a piss take by the Aussies after winning at the Oval (being the ashes of English cricket), a 1908 newspaper report said the ladies presented 'a tiny silver urn, containing what they termed 'the ashes of Australian cricket.' to Bligh (the England captain).

But the urn is made of terracotta, not silver? Confusing. [MENTION=25]Gwylan[/MENTION]?
 




Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
Just reading some wiki, and although the term was first coined as a piss take by the Aussies after winning at the Oval (being the ashes of English cricket), a 1908 newspaper report said 'a tiny silver urn, containing what they termed 'the ashes of Australian cricket.' to Bligh (the England captain).

But the urn is made of terracotta, not silver? Confusing.

One thing I do know, I was saying on Friday/Saturday burn the bails again. What do I know?!?!
 




Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,339
Uffern
Just reading some wiki, and although the term was first coined as a piss take by the Aussies after winning at the Oval (being the ashes of English cricket), a 1908 newspaper report said the ladies presented 'a tiny silver urn, containing what they termed 'the ashes of Australian cricket.' to Bligh (the England captain).

But the urn is made of terracotta, not silver? Confusing. [MENTION=25]Gwylan[/MENTION]?

The urn is terracotta and it was presented in January 1883 not 1908

I wouldn't believe everything you read on wiki
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,200
Goldstone
The urn is terracotta and it was presented in January 1883 not 1908

I wouldn't believe everything you read on wiki
The report was written in 1908, about the urn that was presented in 1883.


After England had won two of the three Tests on the tour, a small urn was presented to Bligh by a group of Melbourne women including Florence Morphy, whom Bligh married within a year.[2] The contents of the urn are reputed to be the ashes of a wooden bail, and were humorously described as "the ashes of Australian cricket".[3] It is not clear whether that "tiny silver urn" is the same as the small terracotta urn given to the MCC by Bligh's widow after his death in 1927.
 




Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
You know that our only hope was for us to write them off.

They really do choke though. As said previously there is a stat that points them out as the biggest chokers in test cricket history. You never get beaten by the sandpaper mill until you are beaten. I'm learning that now.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,200
Goldstone
They did go to Australia a few years back didn't they?
Yes, for the Ashes series of 2006/7 - why? I don't know
Looks like they've been twice:
"the urn remains in the MCC Museum at Lord's; it has however been taken to Australia to be put on touring display on two occasions: as part of the Australian Bicentenary celebrations in 1988, and to accompany the Ashes series in 2006–07. "
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here