So it doesn't include Bernado, Locadia, Jahanbakhsh or Isquierdo?
That four of their most expensive players are not included in the stats? Seems like a bit of a selective choice of data??Dunno but that would be the same for every team.
Bournemouth spend less on wages than we do, but comparable.
Well, well done them then.
So, not so well done them... but still OK.Bournemouth spent £102m on wages in 2017/18 compared to Albion's £78m. About half a million quid a week more.
Bournemouth spent £102m on wages in 2017/18 compared to Albion's £78m. About half a million quid a week more.
That four of their most expensive players are not included in the stats? Seems like a bit of a selective choice of data??
The first table can be used to show that, however, the second shows Hughton is doing better than he 'should'.
The two tables are the same. It's just one is alphabetical order and one is rank order.
You could argue that it shows Hughton is doing better than he should with the players that he chooses to use. However, if Hughton used more of our expensive signings then we would probably be underperforming.
For example picking March and Knockaert over Ali J and Izqueirdo will make our average cost of starting player lower. Whether it's the right decision is a totally different argument.
Shows just how well Burnley did last year. Interesting to see the top two and how their fans whinge about City buying the league - something that has bugged me for years about them both
Bournemouth spend less on wages than we do, but comparable.
Why do Hughton haters ignore such hard facts from you?