[TV] King Danny Dyer

Beach Hut said:

He was basically making fun at himself and using the f word, it was light entertainment and quite amusing in parts.

Click to expand...

exKT17 said:

Oh God, for so many reasons, which build on each other. But since you ask...

Click to expand...

exKT17 said:

Oh God, for so many reasons, which build on each other. But since you ask...

1.) Dyer is an individual without particular virtues that I can discern.

2). He is an actor whose stock-in-trade is portrayal of and also reinforcement of stereotypical grisly male types...

3). ..types whose promulgation supports the BBC's social engineering policy of demonising masculinity so as to "femstroy" "gender-normalcy"

4). OK Maybe the programme hits some 'Horrible History' buttons... I don't agree (because HH is quite elegantly wrought by experts) but even if it were, put it on CBBC - but NO! I wouldn't want this crap poisoning my kids.

5). I pay for this crap, and the only alternative for me is to commit a crime by non-payment of my licence fee. Take away the licence fee and I couldn't care less what the BBC produces, let them die the death as their viewers renounce their supra-PC politics and flood to Netflix.

6). I discern a disgracefully toxic thread in BBC policy of putting up men in male roles who are ignorant/weedy/incompetent/desperate/weak/frothy etc etc. I refer you to my points 2 & 3.

It stinks.

So to draw together these points here, the BBC's apparatchiks are attacking masculinity, they are attacking men and if you are a (non LBGTetc) male they are attacking YOU, lessening your ability to stand up as a good, virtuous dude.

And Dyer's loud, ignorant persona as shown in this programme plays perfectly into their egregious narrative.

Oh, and PS 7). BBC is capable of doing bloody amazing things with history for all ages, where is the virtue in this dismal programming?

Back at you Lawro's left foot!

Click to expand...

beorhthelm said:

you spent waaay to much time thinking about Danny Dyer. and i think contradict yourself, but its far to late and subject too light hearted to get hung up on PC politics. its east end bloke does some history.

Click to expand...

exKT17 said:

Beorthelm I'm intrigued by your angle - may I ask you to expand on your points so I can better synthesise them so to be able to respond?

Click to expand...

LlcoolJ said:

Wow. As a middle aged white bloke I find that rant quite astounding.

I'm not a scared little bunny though. I'll chip in for your tinfoil hat hun. X

Click to expand...

beorhthelm said:

jog on

Click to expand...

exKT17 said:

I listen to/watch a lot of BBC output and I talk to a lot of people who work for them/close to them.

Not a rant. My steadfast belief in view of what I know.

I hope you know what you're voting in LLCJ...

Click to expand...

LlcoolJ said:

Voting in? I didn't realise I could vote for BBC content. [emoji23]

Really couldn't care less about this idea of masculinity being demonised. It's bollocks. You worry about it if you like, but it's massively snowflake.

While women still love cock and swoon over the likes of Ryan Gosling and The Rock (i.e. forever) I'll not be losing any sleep.

Click to expand...

exKT17 said:

Wow! On so many levels! I wonder if you have sons who will one day be looking for jobs, particularly high powered ones... if so I think you should be more worried than you seem to be...

Click to expand...

Knocky's Nose said:

Crying at pictures of kittens will only do for so long.

Click to expand...

exKT17 said:

Wow! On so many levels! I wonder if you have sons who will one day be looking for jobs, particularly high powered ones... if so I think you should be more worried than you seem to be...

Click to expand...

Knocky's Nose said:

I honestly think that one day it'll turn full circle and being a "manly man" will become fashionable again. Crying at pictures of kittens will only do for so long.

Click to expand...

LlcoolJ said:

Yeah, women rule the world don't they. Paranoid rubbish from scared little men.

My son will do just fine thanks. He's 12, he's pretty good at everything and he's already done three years of learning Mandarin, which is a little bit more important than worrying about the output of the BBC when it comes to his future.

You keep pissing your pants though. About nothing.

We all like Danny Dyer btw. The Mrs fancies him, me and the sprog find him funny. I don't see any way that his being on TV can add to your ridiculous end of days scenario for men.

So many things in the world to care about, you're wasting your time on incel nonsense.

Click to expand...

Easy 10 said:

Click to expand...

exKT17 said:

Oh God, for so many reasons, which build on each other. But since you ask...

1.) Dyer is an individual without particular virtues that I can discern.

2). He is an actor whose stock-in-trade is portrayal of and also reinforcement of stereotypical grisly male types...

3). ..types whose promulgation supports the BBC's social engineering policy of demonising masculinity so as to "femstroy" "gender-normalcy"

4). OK Maybe the programme hits some 'Horrible History' buttons... I don't agree (because HH is quite elegantly wrought by experts) but even if it were, put it on CBBC - but NO! I wouldn't want this crap poisoning my kids.

5). I pay for this crap, and the only alternative for me is to commit a crime by non-payment of my licence fee. Take away the licence fee and I couldn't care less what the BBC produces, let them die the death as their viewers renounce their supra-PC politics and flood to Netflix.

6). I discern a disgracefully toxic thread in BBC policy of putting up men in male roles who are ignorant/weedy/incompetent/desperate/weak/frothy etc etc. I refer you to my points 2 & 3.

It stinks.

So to draw together these points here, the BBC's apparatchiks are attacking masculinity, they are attacking men and if you are a (non LBGTetc) male they are attacking YOU, lessening your ability to stand up as a good, virtuous dude.

And Dyer's loud, ignorant persona as shown in this programme plays perfectly into their egregious narrative.

Oh, and PS 7). BBC is capable of doing bloody amazing things with history for all ages, where is the virtue in this dismal programming?

Back at you Lawro's left foot!

Click to expand...