Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Definately Maybe is a good album.
Arctic Monkeys are dross.
Arctic Monkeys are dross.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Today's 'No, Really' Hot Album debate: 1st Oasis album v 1st Arctic Monkeys album
- Thread starter Tom Hark Preston Park
- Start date
Tesco in Disguise
Where do we go from here?
you asked which the better album was. why do you care what they then go on to become?
The Large One
Who's Next?
Why are you comparing two albums 12 years apart?
bellsize seagull
New member
first oasis was like a bolt from the blue for music back in the day...pure class 
jonny.rainbow
Well-known member
- Oct 29, 2005
- 6,614
ChapmansThe Saviour said:
Interesting point that, cos OASIS scrapped Definitely Maybe twice and spent nearly £100,000 on recording, producing and mixing to ensure that it did sound like how the band sounded live and on the demo tapes.
Arctic Monkey's are good but if I could only have one album to listen to for the rest of my life it would be Definitely Maybe.
Last edited:
Artic Monkeys for me, however I have my doubts as to their longevity.
So many bands come along and are good for a few albums, and then thats it. Saying that, I see no reason why they shouldn't be around for a long time...it all hinges on the second album...
So many bands come along and are good for a few albums, and then thats it. Saying that, I see no reason why they shouldn't be around for a long time...it all hinges on the second album...
JJ McClure
Go Jags
Oasis by a country mile. Definately Maybe was great when it first came out and is still great today, not sure the same will be said of Arctic Monkeys effort which although it contains some good tracks sounds somewhat amateur.
Tesco in Disguise
Where do we go from here?
there second album should be good, if their unreleased material is anything to go by.
forever changes pisses all over all of it 
Skaville
Well-known member
Tom Hark said:So... what floats YOUR boat?
For me, Arctic Monkeys just shade it over Oasis. Cos Oasis progressed to stadium rock and laziness, whereas Arctic Monkeys never could, even if they wanted to. Er, innit.
Hmmm. I think you've confused yourself a bit there. The question you posed is which is the better album, but your answer is based around what happened next to Oasis, not the strength of the album and AM's have only been around for a few months, so who knows what the future holds for them. They might spend the next few years covering Sugababes tracks as an act of gratitude for fanning the flames of their overhyped fame
I like the Artic's, but DM is a much better record.
Skaville
Well-known member
Re: Re: Today's 'No, Really' Hot Album debate: 1st Oasis album v 1st Arctic Monkeys album
It's a bit like saying Rooney is better than Pele because Pele went on to have erectile dysfunction.
Jimmy Saville said:
It's a bit like saying Rooney is better than Pele because Pele went on to have erectile dysfunction.
Mr Banana
Tedious chump
Definitely Maybe every time. One of the best records ever.
I completely agree with Chappers about the production on the Monkeys' album, it took a lot of the passion out for me and as a result i have stuck with the downloads rather than bought the real thing.
I completely agree with Chappers about the production on the Monkeys' album, it took a lot of the passion out for me and as a result i have stuck with the downloads rather than bought the real thing.
This.
