Mackenzie
Old Brightonian
I remember Steve Foster stamping on Paul Walsh's ankle when we played Portsmouth, put him out of the game 9 minutes in.
We won.
We won.
If you'd stamped on someone when we were kids playing you'd have been sent home and banned from playing. It just wasn't a thing in proper football. . . . Neither was diving or cheating.
Straight red every time.
Hugging and shirt pulling should be a yellow minimum as well.
Deliberate in your case maybe, but l certainly don't think that Ampadu set out to deliberately injure their player. That said in the current interpretation of the rules, then he did deserve to go.
There is a difference between deliberately attempting to injure a player and deliberately stamping on the foot. Ampadu definitely did the latter. We can never know how much, if any injury he intended.
There are some 'old school' pundits who make out that no foul is ever deliberate. My explanation is they don't understand the meaning of the word.
Finally if a player deliberately stamps on a player's foot I don't care if he intended only to momentarily inconvenience the player without causing any injury, or not. I doesn't have to be a full Keane/Haaland to be a red card.
Somewhere around 0.10 seconds earlier the ball was were Ampadus foot ended up. You can even see the ball leaving Bernardeschis foot and Ampadus incoming foot in the same frame.
View attachment 137866
Its a poor tackle, a poor attempt to get the ball but in no way a deliberate attempt to stomp his feet. I'm sure Ampadu wishes he got the quality and football intelligence to predict Bernardeschis decision to make a pass with the outside of his foot in that moment, so that he could either take the ball or the player, but he had no idea what he was doing.
Still stamped on his ankle/foot though and that is a sending off offence. FACT
Still stamped on his ankle/foot though and that is a sending off offence. FACT
Yes, no doubt. But its not deliberate.
is the only think that mattered.
As I said we can ponder whether it was intended to injure or not (or not). That is irrelevant (and a tedious mantra from old skool pundits, or former team mates). It has happened so many times in the last 18 months it is clearly a 'thing', i.e., a learned tactic.
The only time I received one of these was in 1985. By then I'd played thousands of hours of football. The bloke who did it was standing next to me and just trod on my foot then apologised. I was playing for a uni team and we were playing 'scottish veterans' (blokes mostly over 40). It is pure snidery, as noted, mpre painful than shirt pulling and less painful than testicle squeezing (the latter now gone from the game as it would get a 'nonce tag' as well as a red card).
I'd be interested to know, from thise who play amateur football, how many times a game this happens now (albeit when I say 'now' there hasn't been much fotball for 18 months which is roughly when this became a 'thing' as far as I recall (by 'thing' I mean at least one stamping per game)) versus maybe 5 years ago.
So you keep saying. I know enough about probabilities to be able to deduce that it is unquestionably deliberate (because it almost never happened 15, 20, 30 years ago).
We have an expression here, that was once a common chant at Albion games: 'Get into 'em, **** them up'. This is just another example of 'letting the opponent know you're there' and it has increased in the last year or so to the point of absurdity.
Ok and I know enough to say it was very unlikely to be deliberate. I also know it definitely happened in the past as well.
How you've managed to play football more than a few hours with only one person stepping on your feet is beyond me because it happens very easily.