[News] Excessive parking fine or fair cop?

Icy Gull · Jun 3, 2021

Convince me that the Law is not an Ass....Mods please delete thread if I can’t say this

I cannot get my head around what has happened here, it’s ridiculous

I am astounded that any company would go to court over an overturned £100 parking fine, that was 2 minutes over the grace period.

Thoughts?

https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/193...rking-solution-stopping-eastgate-wharf-lewes/

beorhthelm · Jun 3, 2021

i'd say both. person parked, though its excessive for the company to take to appeal.

Super Steve Earle · Jun 3, 2021

The Argus comments suggest it might be wise to delete this thread.

The Optimist · Jun 3, 2021

The original fine is a fair cop. She used a parking space with no intention of paying for it. Whether you use the space to take a call or pop in a shop for a couple of things doesn’t really matter. On the point of the grace period it wasn’t like she was using the time to read the prices / terms and conditions to decide “actually I don’t want to park here”.

Worried Man Blues · Jun 3, 2021

Naughty people will always have an excuse.

Stat Brother · Jun 3, 2021

Worried Man Blues said:
Naughty people will always have an excuse.

Deffo, I'd like to direct anyone taking Norma at face value to my magic bean store.

bluenitsuj · Jun 3, 2021

Norma was 'expecting the call' so should organise herself better.

Stat Brother · Jun 3, 2021

bluenitsuj said:
Norma was 'expecting the call' so should organise herself better.

Esp as her sister Daisy always calls at that time to talk about the previous evenings bingo.

Boroseagull · Jun 3, 2021

bluenitsuj said:
Norma was 'expecting the call' so should organise herself better.

Like pairing her phone to the cars Bluetooth.

Official Old Man · Jun 3, 2021

mmm. Whilst having sympathy with the driver, and a hatred for the parking company, a rule is a rule. Stay static for over 10 minutes in a parking zone and you have to pay.

studio150 · Jun 3, 2021

Think we had a lengthy thread on this when the driver won the original case.

I can only assume that the Parking Company decided to appeal to ensure that going forward no one could use the 'phone call defence'. Not sure how they racked up £4k in fees to appeal.

drew · Jun 3, 2021

She should have just paid the fine. She pulled into a car park which, looking at where it is, she already knew about. The bays, if they are the ones shown in the picture (taken from Google streetview) are clearly marked as private car park. Just around the corner to the left is the Waitrose car park which is free for two hours.

Stat Brother · Jun 3, 2021

drew said:
She should have just paid the fine. She pulled into a car park which, looking at where it is, she already knew about. The bays, if they are the ones shown in the picture (taken from Google streetview) are clearly marked as private car park. Just around the corner to the left is the Waitrose car park which is free for two hours.

Yeah but that one's not right next to the Post Office. :wink:

Greg Bobkin · Jun 3, 2021

Icy Gull said:
Convince me that the Law is not an Ass....Mods please delete thread if I can’t say this

I cannot get my head around what has happened here, it’s ridiculous

I am astounded that any company would go to court over an overturned £100 parking fine, that was 2 minutes over the grace period.

Thoughts?

https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/193...rking-solution-stopping-eastgate-wharf-lewes/

I'm not clicking on the link because I don't do the Arsegas, but if you've outstayed your welcome – by two minutes or two hours – it's a fair cop and you should accept that you got caught and pay up.

Icy Gull · Jun 3, 2021

Greg Bobkin said:
I'm not clicking on the link because I don't do the Arsegas, but if you've outstayed your welcome – by two minutes or two hours – it's a fair cop and you should accept that you got caught and pay up.

Fair enough NSC appears to have decided that paying 4k for her pisstake is OK :smile:

I am a lone voice here!

drew · Jun 3, 2021

Icy Gull said:
Fair enough NSC appears to have decided that paying 4k for her pisstake is OK

I am a lone voice here!

No, paying £100 was the penalty for parking. She took umbrage at the audacity of someone not wanting her to park in their private car park and is now paying the price.

banjo · Jun 3, 2021

If you don’t think it’s fair, she’s got a go fund me page you can help her out.

Icy Gull · Jun 3, 2021

banjo said:
If you don’t think it’s fair, she’s got a go fund me page you can help her out.

As if

Fair doesn’t come into it, it’s just that the fine was overturned and she ends up with a 4k bill on appeal. Would even one of you expected that outcome?

Stat Brother · Jun 3, 2021

Just because one side is morally repugnant it doesn't automatically follow the other side is Mahatma Gandhi.

Norma could have done a fair few things differently and not ended up with a bill for 4k.
In the least surprising news of the day, we, as a species, have major problems with accepting responsibility for our actions if they occur while sat in the driver's seat of a car.

WATFORD zero · Jun 3, 2021

Stat Brother said:
Just because one side is morally repugnant it doesn't automatically follow the other side is Mahatma Gandhi.

Norma could have done a fair few things differently and not ended up with a bill for 4k.
In the least surprising news of the day, we, as a species, have major problems with accepting responsibility for our actions if they occur while sat in the driver's seat of a car.

It doesn't only occur in cars .......

polling booths as well :wink:

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Excessive parking fine or fair cop?

Back on the rollercoaster

A. Virgo, Football Genius

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Listen to me!!!

Well-known member

Well-known member

Uckfield Seagull

Well-known member

Drew

Well-known member

Silver Seagull

Back on the rollercoaster

Drew

GOSBTS

Back on the rollercoaster

Well-known member

Well-known member

Share this page