[Cricket] India v England 4th T20

PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Sep 15, 2004

18,686

Hurst Green

• Mar 18, 2021

• #1

India bat 18/0 off 2

 

pasty

A different kind of pasty

Jul 5, 2003

30,259

West, West, West Sussex

• Mar 18, 2021

• #2

Jof strikes

Sharma c&b Archer 12

21/1

 

dazzer6666

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Mar 27, 2013

52,356

Burgess Hill

• Mar 18, 2021

• #3

Rahul happily wasting the pp then holing out

Don’t really want 12 overs of Kohli now though.

Edit. Absolute VILLAGE from Kohli there

 

Titanic

Super Moderator

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,057

West Sussex

• Mar 18, 2021

• #4

dazzer6666 said:

Rahul happily wasting the pp then holing out

Don’t really want 12 overs of Kohli now though.

Click to expand...

Kohli done up like a kipper by Adil Rashid

70-3 (8.4)

 

PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Sep 15, 2004

18,686

Hurst Green

• Mar 18, 2021

• Thread starter
• #5

Hahahahahaha and ha

 

Pavilionaire

Well-known member

Jul 7, 2003

30,560

• Mar 18, 2021

• #6

Wickets falling at the right moments but Yadav still there.

Pants at the crease.

 

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP

Jul 5, 2003

61,747

Location Location

• Mar 18, 2021

• #7

Christ, I thought VAR was bad. That took forever.

 

dazzer6666

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Mar 27, 2013

52,356

Burgess Hill

• Mar 18, 2021

• #8

Impossible to tell if that was a clean catch.........on balance right decision reached as soft signal was out I guess but all a bit unsatisfactory really

Third ump would have given that not out without the soft signal

 

Prince Monolulu

Everything in Moderation

Oct 2, 2013

10,201

The Race Hill

• Mar 18, 2021

• #9

Athers correct.

Ridiculous soft decision.

That said, it still looked as if it hit the deck.

Poor.

 

Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park

NSC Patron

Apr 5, 2014

23,515

• Mar 18, 2021

• #10

I was thinking the same as Atherton there. It's not conclusive. It didn't look out though. His fingers widened as his hands went to ground. I'd be annoyed if I was the batsman.

This is not a decision for an on-field umpire.

 

dazzer6666

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Mar 27, 2013

52,356

Burgess Hill

• Mar 18, 2021

• #11

Benefit of the doubt should be with the batter..........soft signal makes no sense in that kind of situation

 

dazzer6666

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Mar 27, 2013

52,356

Burgess Hill

• Mar 18, 2021

• #12

Here we go again

 

Javeaseagull

Well-known member

Feb 22, 2014

2,491

• Mar 18, 2021

• #13

I promise not to moan about VAR again!

 

Pevenseagull

Anti-greed coalition

Jul 20, 2003

19,609

• Mar 18, 2021

• #14

Bowling Jof (apart from the last ball which was awful... but ended up a dot ball anyway)

 

bhafc99

Well-known member

Oct 14, 2003

7,080

Dubai

• Mar 18, 2021

• #15

Anyone know why they had spectators at the first two games, but not now? Is it a Covid thing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

S

Si Gull

Way Down South

Mar 18, 2008

4,372

On top of the world

• Mar 18, 2021

• #16

bhafc99 said:

Anyone know why they had spectators at the first two games, but not now? Is it a Covid thing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

Yes, increasing local infection rate.

 

PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Sep 15, 2004

18,686

Hurst Green

• Mar 18, 2021

• Thread starter
• #17

bhafc99 said:

Anyone know why they had spectators at the first two games, but not now? Is it a Covid thing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

Yes. Odd as they slowly ramped up crowds and then bang closed down again.

 

PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Sep 15, 2004

18,686

Hurst Green

• Mar 18, 2021

• Thread starter
• #18

Wonderful reply so far..............

 

dazzer6666

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Mar 27, 2013

52,356

Burgess Hill

• Mar 18, 2021

• #19

Playing for the draw ?

 

studio150

Well-known member

Jul 30, 2011

29,607

On the Border

• Mar 18, 2021

• #20

Roy still going well with 40 off 26

65-2