Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[Albion] Lee Mason



macbeth

macbeth

Dismembered
Jan 3, 2018
3,711
six feet beneath the moon...
Firstly the Southampton handball debacle, then the pathetic red card for soucek (he was the VAR) and now this. All in the space of a month.

Surely they need to have a think here. Is he really fit to be refereeing in the best league in the world?
 
















DavidinSouthampton

DavidinSouthampton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 3, 2012
16,582
I would normally be fairly tolerant of refs, but that really was a pathetic display. How he can expect anyone on either team to have any respect for him after that I don’t know.
 








Gazwag

Gazwag

5 millionth post poster
Mar 4, 2004
30,137
Bexhill-on-Sea
Jovis said:
He’s really not the reason why we’re losing at half time
Click to expand...

Well than not the point is it :facepalm:

The second whistle was 100% after the ball crossed the line, it was a goal. Both players in offside positions were not interfering with play, as proved by the replays.

Has to go and never ref again
 






dazzer6666

dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
52,399
Burgess Hill
Totally shambolic.........needs to be dropped from the list. Why did he even need VAR, he must have known what he did and why.
 


J

Jovis

Active member
Mar 30, 2012
182
vagabond said:
Yes. Yes he is.

We’ve been poor, but that’s irrelevant. A perfectly good goal ruled out.
Click to expand...

I don’t disagree it’s a legit goal. I’m just more worried about the level of our performance than Mason’s.
 


Frutos

Frutos

.
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
May 3, 2006
35,549
Northumberland
Nuno Espirito Santo was fined 25k for saying that Mason isn't good enough to ref at PL level, after that I hope he'll be asking for a refund.
 




neilbard

neilbard

Hedging up
Oct 8, 2013
6,245
Tyringham
Green Cross Code Man said:
He wasn't interfering as the goalie was miles out of position.
Click to expand...

Gazwag said:
Well than not the point is it :facepalm:

The second whistle was 100% after the ball crossed the line, it was a goal. Both players in offside positions were not interfering with play, as proved by the replays.

Has to go and never ref again
Click to expand...

The problem here is Mason should not have blown the whistle when he could clearly see their keeper still lining up the wall, farcical.

I do agree Burn wasn't interfering..
 


A1X

A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
17,758
Deepest, darkest Sussex
It's not all bad though. He's given the Potter In crowd their excuse for our defeat well before half time, so they can kick back and relax us watching us rack up the possession.
 


U

usernamed

New member
Aug 31, 2017
763
A1X said:
It's not all bad though. He's given the Potter In crowd their excuse for our defeat well before half time, so they can kick back and relax us watching us rack up the possession.
Click to expand...

I’m pro-Potter, but I am sometimes reminded of the “Underpant Gnomes” episode of South Park. Except in Potter’s case it would go:

1. Possession
2. ????
3. Victory!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


father_and_son

father_and_son

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2012
4,646
Under the Police Box
Bad day to end a bad month.

Clearly shouldn't have blown ... But he did.
If you tell players of all ages to "play to the whistle" and ignore that whistle that the players played to, you have to question his fitness to referee at this level.
 




DJ NOBO

DJ NOBO

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2004
6,334
Wiltshire
Going on and on about that decision is only going to lead to pain.
 




You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here