[Albion] Making sense of last night's team selection

blue-shifted said:

Rotation is clearly the biggest factor, he did similar last year

I also think there is more too it than we know about. Maybe a message to his strikers that they aren't as indispensable as they think they are. It probably wasn't a roaring success on this front.

Click to expand...

vagabond said:

I think Occam’s razor comes into play. Most obvious answer? Players were tired and we needed fresh legs in the team.

Also players like Mac, Bernardo, Proper and AJ have hardly started this season. So a good run out.

Part of me wonders if this was a last chance saloon for a few (Bernardo, Proper and AJ especially). “I don’t think you’re good enough for the first team. Prove me wrong”.

We will likely find out in the next window or two.

Click to expand...

GT49er said:

It wasn't a roaring success on any front!

Click to expand...

Stat Brother said:

Ah but in the Potterverse it was a quintessential game.

Team set up perfectly.
Opposition completely ineffectual for first 45 minutes.
Play nice football.
Squander a couple of half decent chances.
Overthinking in the final third also costly.
Outplayed for 10 minutes at the start of the second half.
Concede a really poor goal.
Never look like scoring.

Click to expand...

vagabond said:

I think Occam’s razor comes into play. Most obvious answer? Players were tired and we needed fresh legs in the team.

Also players like Mac, Bernardo, Proper and AJ have hardly started this season. So a good run out.

Part of me wonders if this was a last chance saloon for a few (Bernardo, Proper and AJ especially). “I don’t think you’re good enough for the first team. Prove me wrong”.

We will likely find out in the next window or two.

Click to expand...

Guinness Boy said:

Learn from it and take the positives.

Click to expand...

Swansman said:

Emptying the Cupboard?
Was it using the last game to a) put some players in the shop window to support January's transfer business and/or b) show Tony "this is all I got to play with Tony"?
Would you sacrafice points to do that? Did he need to meet contractual clauses for players game time?

a) no, football clubs dont do window shopping. b) no, he is able to verbally communicate with TB.
And no, there are no such things as contractual clauses regulating game time - that, much like a lot of other things, only exists in the minds of fans. It might exist in baseball or cricket or any other joke sport, **** do I know, but it doesnt exist in football.

Confidence?
Was it a case of picking a team that showed the most confidence? It's hard to conceive Maupay and Wellbeck wouldn't have been bouncing around the training ground ready to give Arsenal a game.

Cant say for sure but Im 99% sure its not the case. Plenty of the players who played yesterday are most likely pretty low on confidence having not played much this season.

"Rotation?
Okay this is plausible with Christmas fixtures, but is Wolves considered more winnable? Wouldn't analysis have said playing a striker will improve the odds vs Arsenal so maybe at least give a striker a half? Maupay hasn't played all fixtures and not played 90 minutes in all the fixtures he's played."

If Wolves is more winable or not doesnt matter when Wolves is not the game played 48 hours after the West Ham game. Potter just like other managers cant tell his players "bro, could you wait three days to get tired from your previous game?". The human body doesnt work like that. As for "not playing a striker", Ali J played striker last night, if he is a good one or not is a different question.

"Behind closed doors?
Is it something we arn't meant to know? Have some of the squad groaned at the prospect of us breaking bad and considering Glenn Murray as an option? Has there been dissent in the ranks? It's hard to beleive Wellbeck would be caught up in that if it were true. This seems a less likely reason."

No most likely not.

"Best team?
This is the one which has now spooked me. Granted I haven't seen all the data, analysis and coaching team inputs to know what may be the best team to put out, but my feeling was that wasn't it. Yes I liked the way the first half played out, but I thought at half time Ali would be off and we'd see one striker followed by another in phased substitution to take the game to Arsenal. I'm spooked if Potter thinks all the cards were played right. I think he's an intelligent manager who knows good football. Surely there is a constraint which is shaping these decisions, maybe it's just another game he called wrong and it's okay...that's going to happen, but please give us a clue."

No. Reasonably fit, reasonably non-shite.

Click to expand...

81jamie said:

I like AJ and really want him to do well, but it's not going to happen. I was happy with the team we put out yesterday and thought Mac Alister did well, but how many more opportunities is AJ going to get? Why start him up front when Zeqiri could've been given a chance? Connelly, for me at least, isn't anywhere near the level needed and would benefit from more game time in the Championship, so give Zeqiri a shot as he looked lively enough when coming on the other day.

Click to expand...

twickers said:

I know, the title of this thread is a mine field and risks overlapping with a dozen question threads, but...

I sadly woke up pondering what drive Potter to the starting line up against Arsenal. Why, for example, start Ali J ahead of a striker? I can't make sense of it.

Emptying the Cupboard?
Was it using the last game to a) put some players in the shop window to support January's transfer business and/or b) show Tony "this is all I got to play with Tony"?
Would you sacrafice points to do that? Did he need to meet contractual clauses for players game time?

Confidence?
Was it a case of picking a team that showed the most confidence? It's hard to conceive Maupay and Wellbeck wouldn't have been bouncing around the training ground ready to give Arsenal a game.

Rotation?
Okay this is plausible with Christmas fixtures, but is Wolves considered more winnable? Wouldn't analysis have said playing a striker will improve the odds vs Arsenal so maybe at least give a striker a half? Maupay hasn't played all fixtures and not played 90 minutes in all the fixtures he's played.

Behind closed doors?
Is it something we arn't meant to know? Have some of the squad groaned at the prospect of us breaking bad and considering Glenn Murray as an option? Has there been dissent in the ranks? It's hard to beleive Wellbeck would be caught up in that if it were true. This seems a less likely reason.

Best team?
This is the one which has now spooked me. Granted I haven't seen all the data, analysis and coaching team inputs to know what may be the best team to put out, but my feeling was that wasn't it. Yes I liked the way the first half played out, but I thought at half time Ali would be off and we'd see one striker followed by another in phased substitution to take the game to Arsenal. I'm spooked if Potter thinks all the cards were played right. I think he's an intelligent manager who knows good football. Surely there is a constraint which is shaping these decisions, maybe it's just another game he called wrong and it's okay...that's going to happen, but please give us a clue.

Click to expand...

twickers said:

I know, the title of this thread is a mine field and risks overlapping with a dozen question threads, but...

I sadly woke up pondering what drive Potter to the starting line up against Arsenal. Why, for example, start Ali J ahead of a striker? I can't make sense of it.

Emptying the Cupboard?
Was it using the last game to a) put some players in the shop window to support January's transfer business and/or b) show Tony "this is all I got to play with Tony"?
Would you sacrafice points to do that? Did he need to meet contractual clauses for players game time?

Confidence?
Was it a case of picking a team that showed the most confidence? It's hard to conceive Maupay and Wellbeck wouldn't have been bouncing around the training ground ready to give Arsenal a game.

Rotation?
Okay this is plausible with Christmas fixtures, but is Wolves considered more winnable? Wouldn't analysis have said playing a striker will improve the odds vs Arsenal so maybe at least give a striker a half? Maupay hasn't played all fixtures and not played 90 minutes in all the fixtures he's played.

Behind closed doors?
Is it something we arn't meant to know? Have some of the squad groaned at the prospect of us breaking bad and considering Glenn Murray as an option? Has there been dissent in the ranks? It's hard to beleive Wellbeck would be caught up in that if it were true. This seems a less likely reason.

Best team?
This is the one which has now spooked me. Granted I haven't seen all the data, analysis and coaching team inputs to know what may be the best team to put out, but my feeling was that wasn't it. Yes I liked the way the first half played out, but I thought at half time Ali would be off and we'd see one striker followed by another in phased substitution to take the game to Arsenal. I'm spooked if Potter thinks all the cards were played right. I think he's an intelligent manager who knows good football. Surely there is a constraint which is shaping these decisions, maybe it's just another game he called wrong and it's okay...that's going to happen, but please give us a clue.

Click to expand...

81jamie said:

I like AJ and really want him to do well, but it's not going to happen. I was happy with the team we put out yesterday and thought Mac Alister did well, but how many more opportunities is AJ going to get? Why start him up front when Zeqiri could've been given a chance? Connelly, for me at least, isn't anywhere near the level needed and would benefit from more game time in the Championship, so give Zeqiri a shot as he looked lively enough when coming on the other day.

Click to expand...

vagabond said:

Part of me wonders if this was a last chance saloon for a few (Bernardo, Proper and AJ especially). “I don’t think you’re good enough for the first team. Prove me wrong”.

Click to expand...