[Misc] Global warming....possible to argue?

Hu_Camus · Nov 5, 2020

I often wonder if there is another possible "truth", these people make a credible case, but I wouldn't go so far as to say 'I believe' - the following pages are an interesting place to start.
https://electroverse.net/category/crop-loss/

sydney · Nov 5, 2020

some people say it's cyclic ....it may well be but i think you would need to be a total moron to think that a 400% rise in the human population in under 100 years will not have an adverse effect on the climate/environment.......7.6 billion of the ****ers ffs.....thats a lot of shit.

Tom Bombadil · Nov 5, 2020

Hu_Camus said:
I often wonder if there is another possible "truth", these people make a credible case, but I wouldn't go so far as to say 'I believe' - the following pages are an interesting place to start.
https://electroverse.net/category/crop-loss/

A little investigation reveals that to be a psedoscientific site of no value whatsoever.

Hu_Camus · Nov 5, 2020

Voroshilov said:
A little investigation reveals that to be a psedoscientific site of no value whatsoever.

You have me in your thrall, feel free to illuminate.

In fact, I must insist.

brightn'ove · Nov 5, 2020

Calling Dr. No

NooBHA · Nov 5, 2020

Hu_Camus said:
I often wonder if there is another possible "truth", these people make a credible case, but I wouldn't go so far as to say 'I believe' - the following pages are an interesting place to start.
https://electroverse.net/category/crop-loss/

My Condolences on losing the US Election '' Donald ''

Have you thought about taking it all the way to the US Supreme Court - I am positive there must have been a lot of Votes that hadn't been counted by 4 in the morning. There is no way that they should be allowed to be counted.

beorhthelm · Nov 5, 2020

solar output is known to vary and obviously going to have some effect on temperatures. unfortunately its not included in models or discussion, so its difficult to judge what impact. the site doesnt make a good case for objectivity, with dozens of pictures of fozen landscapes.

Barnet Seagull · Nov 5, 2020

The Large One · Nov 5, 2020

Then there's mere fact he's still calling it 'global warming' when the scientists dropped that a while ago, and use the term 'climate change'.

So yes, you can argue - if you wish to use alternate facts.

Hu_Camus · Nov 5, 2020

sydney said:
some people say it's cyclic ....it may well be but i think you would need to be a total moron to think that a 400% rise in the human population in under 100 years will not have an adverse effect on the climate/environment.......7.6 billion of the ****ers ffs.....thats a lot of shit.

A convincing and yet delightfully concise postulation , ...want to share your take on the Riemann hypothesis?

Tom Bombadil · Nov 5, 2020

Hu_Camus said:
You have me in your thrall, feel free to illuminate.

In fact, I must insist.

Sorry mate this will be the last post where I will engage with you . If you want a serious argument with people you'll have to do better than linking to the page of an obvious bullshitter. It's tiring playing whackamole with you fringe nutters. If this thread isn't trolling then you are obviously a tin foil hatted loon and my wifi is too flakey today to waste time with this nonsense

Hu_Camus · Nov 5, 2020

The Large One said:
Then there's mere fact he's still calling it 'global warming' when the scientists dropped that a while ago, and use the term 'climate change'.

So yes, you can argue - if you wish to use alternate facts.

I'm not sure it would be healthy to live in a world of such certitude.

It nearly drove poor Copernicus insane.

Hu_Camus · Nov 5, 2020

Voroshilov said:
Sorry mate this will be the last post where I will engage with you . If you want a serious argument with people you'll have to do better than linking to the page of an obvious bullshitter. It's tiring playing whackamole with you fringe nutters. If this thread isn't trolling then you are obviously a tin foil hatted loon and my wifi is too flakey today to waste time with this nonsense

O me miserum :yawn:

Blue3 · Nov 5, 2020

sydney said:
some people say it's cyclic ....it may well be but i think you would need to be a total moron to think that a 400% rise in the human population in under 100 years will not have an adverse effect on the climate/environment.......7.6 billion of the ****ers ffs.....thats a lot of shit.

Global heating and cooling is Cyclical no one has ever questioned that we have had several in the history of earth and two in the last 500,000 years, what's diffrent about this current event is as a result of humans we only need to look at the increase in C02 since the start of the industrial revolution to see the steady rise in global temperatures.

The Clamp · Nov 5, 2020

Anyone that still doesn’t get it and is debating man made climate change is about 30 years behind the curve, whose time would be better spent snorkling in the La Brea tar pits.

Hu_Camus · Nov 5, 2020

Blue3 said:
Global heating and cooling is Cyclical no one has ever questioned that we have had several in the history of earth and two in the last 500,000 years, what's diffrent about this current event is as a result of humans we only need to look at the increase in C02 since the start of the industrial revolution to see the steady rise in global temperatures.

That there is a coorelation is beyond doubt, but could it yet be coincidence?
The reason I flew this flag was that their theory of a tragic conflation of GSM and Polar shift, if it were true, could mean that Solar Flares wipe out our electronic life (think internet fried irredeemably) and they postulate that GSM this time coincides with a Polar shift that happens only about as frequently as Yellowstone erupts.
I was hoping for a debate beyond the monochrome monosylabics.

The site quote NASA (with links) for arguments sake sometimes.

Hu_Camus · Nov 5, 2020

The Clamp said:
Anyone that still doesn’t get it and is debating man made climate change is about 30 years behind the curve, whose time would be better spent snorkling in the La Brea tar pits.

You believe, I get it.
In my lifetime our tectonic plates were unimagined....but I guess you'd have told old Alfred Wegener he was a **** because you KNOW.

Dr. No · Nov 5, 2020

Hu_Camus said:
I often wonder if there is another possible "truth"...

brightn'ove said:
Calling Dr. No

No.

nicko31 · Nov 5, 2020

NSC flat earthers will be here shortly...

The Clamp · Nov 5, 2020

Hu_Camus said:
You believe, I get it.
In my lifetime our tectonic plates were unimagined....but I guess you'd have told old Alfred Wegener he was a **** because you KNOW.

This will be my last response to your trolling. If you really do believe that climate change is not man made and not a crisis of the uptmost urgency then all the very best to you. I’m sure that will be of great comfort to you when the planet starts tanking.
In the meantime, some advice; JCL’s like you, the idiot ones, like you, start these trolling threads about once a year. It always ends with you looking stupid. I’d walk away if I were you.

Believe me, in about 40 years time Covid will seem like an outbreak of nits and Brexit, like a ****ing birthday present.

Have a lovely day.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Misc] Global warming....possible to argue?

New member

tinky ****in winky

Well-known member

New member

cringe

Well-known member

A. Virgo, Football Genius

Luxury Player

Who's Next?

New member

Well-known member

New member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Share this page