Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Welcoming refugees. Well done Brits!
- Thread starter The Clamp
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #2,702
I won’t be taking opinions on Jewish refugees in Nazi Germany from a man who chooses to name himself after a Nazi death squad, Das Reich. You’ve kind of forfeited that right.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
By replying you just did, you clown
I love occasionally reading you posts. They never fail to disappoint.
Comedy gold.
He doesn't do irony.
Or anything, really.
Still, @PotG will be along soon to bail him out with some miss-placed whatboutery, followed by silence.
Is it nature or nurture?
Last edited:
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
By replying you just did, you clown
I love occasionally reading you posts. They never fail to disappoint.
You're like a old skag head H have me on ignore but when push comes to shove you can't do without me .
Regards
DF
rogersix
Well-known member
- Jan 18, 2014
- 7,905
Last edited:
rogersix
Well-known member
- Jan 18, 2014
- 7,905
yeah, you do have a desperate need to be needed by someone, anyone, even a virtual someone.
you've got a lot in common with your sex pest mentor; a singleton with an internet connection, and a desperate need for attention.
shame.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
yeah, you do have a desperate need to be needed by someone, anyone, even a virtual someone.
you've got a lot in common with your sex pest mentor; a singleton with an internet connection, and a desperate need for attention.
shame.
Shame on you todge
https://youtu.be/OY7-Drjj9ns
Regards
DF
- Jul 10, 2003
- 25,952
It's rather ironic that NSC's regular racist, anti-Semite, homophobic, scrounging, nazi supporting moron should post a video where someone is saying that.
Because you just know he's a little porky f***er with gold chains
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
You seem rather angry. Not good for your blood pressure.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 25,952
Over an hour for your completely meaningless response trying to defend Ppf ? Someone is slipping.
Did you forget to take your phone to the toilet with you
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
It's rather ironic that NSC's regular racist, anti-Semite, homophobic, scrounging, nazi supporting moron should post a video where someone is saying that.
Because you just know he's a little porky f***er with gold chains
Woof woof !
Regards
DF
Same old meaningless shit, just like the rest of you.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Pointless ****.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/ukne...-unlawful-says-judge/ar-AAPXQbT?ocid=msedgntp
A London council acted unlawfully when placing a child seeking asylum in a hotel pending assessments of their age, a High Court judge has concluded.
Mr Justice Poole, ruled in favour of the child and two others seeking asylum, who were put in a hotel in the late summer of 2020 by Brent council.
A child would usually be placed into foster care or supported, independent living arrangements immediately.
He said that the council acted “unlawfully” and “unreasonably” when deciding not to properly accommodate the three people, under the 1989 Children Act.
Mr Poole said there was no evidence the child was “safeguarded against risk from adult strangers” in the hotel, or that there was any protection of the child’s welfare or that of the two other people.
The council disputed the claims, with their lawyer’s saying the asylum-seekers had been provided with appropriate accommodation and were thought to be “at least 25 years old”.
A London council acted unlawfully when placing a child seeking asylum in a hotel pending assessments of their age, a High Court judge has concluded.
Mr Justice Poole, ruled in favour of the child and two others seeking asylum, who were put in a hotel in the late summer of 2020 by Brent council.
A child would usually be placed into foster care or supported, independent living arrangements immediately.
He said that the council acted “unlawfully” and “unreasonably” when deciding not to properly accommodate the three people, under the 1989 Children Act.
Mr Poole said there was no evidence the child was “safeguarded against risk from adult strangers” in the hotel, or that there was any protection of the child’s welfare or that of the two other people.
The council disputed the claims, with their lawyer’s saying the asylum-seekers had been provided with appropriate accommodation and were thought to be “at least 25 years old”.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
https://youtu.be/MIpWwJrcV88
Listen to this humpty talking about accepting 100, 000 a year FFS !
Regards
DF
Listen to this humpty talking about accepting 100, 000 a year FFS !
Regards
DF
Randy McNob
Now go home and get your f#cking Shinebox
- Jun 13, 2020
- 4,487
take back control instead ?
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Get a grip Randy, you're becoming a 'take back control' freak.