Page 43 of 43 FirstFirst ... 3340414243
Results 421 to 426 of 426

Thread: Divock Origi

  1. #421
    Join Date
    Feb 2005

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by DIFFBROOK View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Isnt that the same for any player?

    What is set is the max sale fee from the start for Liverpool. I guess, if he is worth £50m in 2 or 3 years time, then whoever buys him has lost £14m.
    Not really. The fact Liverpool have a guaranteed 'future' value, who if he is as good as the potential is surely worth more than £36M.

    It does not really fit in with how we have operated in looking for good, undervalued players and look to make an increase
    900k people in Bromley & Croydon, almost double pop of Manchester. Bigger than Norwich & Ipswich. Fickle fans in terms of attendance, cup games increased attendance do not help.
    Steve Parish - CPFC2010

    • North Stand Chat

      Join Date: Jul 2003
      Posts: Lots


    • #422

      0 Not allowed!
      You're looking at this the wrong way people.

      Divock has investigated Brighton, likes what he has found and is now following Shane Duffy's genius approach. Start having some shockers so the club aren't so worried about losing you, or the price. Then join the Albion and display your true potential. Mark my words, he'll score an own goal or get a red within his next two games.

      It's on.
    • #423
      Join Date
      Apr 2017

      4 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Springal View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Brewster looks like a bad deal though. £20M for the player, but Liverpool also want £36M buy back clause. So basically if he turns out to be PL quality then we 'only' make £16M. Or if he isn't that good he's still cost us £20M+ wages
      If he is quality though, we will comfortably make a lot more than a £16million profit by a) staying in the Premier League, and b) placing higher up the table (£2m a place).
      If he is as good as he is rated, we will also get to see a top player in the making, making his name at the Amex. If we come out of that after 2 years and then have £36m and are a more attractive prospect to replace him, fantastic.

      If he isn't up to scratch, we have paid a similar amount on the gambles that we've been making on forward players pretty consistently in the PL years so far. Maupay, Trossard, Locadia, Jahanbakhsh, all cost close to the £20m mark.
      "Do what you do, stay as you are, let's keep having fun." Sam Baldock
    • #424
      Members Marshy's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2003

      1 Not allowed!
      Liverpool wont buy this lad back unless he is ridiculously good.... in which case we get a couple of great years out of him.

      They are looking at players like Mbappe etc going forward..
      Time for some proper football, win lose or draw :-)
    • #425
      Members dazzer6666's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2013
      Burgess Hill

      0 Not allowed!
      We don’t absolutely have to get someone better than what we have.......ideally yes but not essential. We do need someone to complement what we have though as we’re a bit thin in the event of injury, and Maupay/Connolly need competition. Is Origi good enough for that ? Of course he ****ing is.
      "Prejudice is a great time saver. You can form opinions without having to get the facts"
    • #426
      Members Blue3's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2014

      0 Not allowed!
      He scored a cracking goal against Lincoln late in the game where he ran from the halfway line to collect the ball and put away a difficult first time finish plus he set up another goal with a cushioned header to a player running in behind him, he a quality player big strong and fast, if we were to sign him and it's a big if I would be delighted


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts