Derbyshire Seagull
Active member
- Oct 21, 2005
- 565
well the arrogant sod has got himself kicked out of US Open for hitting a line judge with a ball.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Other Sport] Djokovic Kicked Out
- Thread starter Derbyshire Seagull
- Start date
AmexRuislip
Trainee Spy 🕵️♂️
Game set sacked....
Coldeanseagull
Opinionated
You cannot be serious?
I am serious, and don't call me...wait, that's not right.
Coldeanseagull
Opinionated
I am serious, and don't call me...wait, that's not right.
Shirley you got that wrong?
Music City Gull
Not Changing This, Bozza
Rules are rules and he knows them, but it didn’t seem like he meant to hit the person.
[tweet]1302703283358896131[/tweet]
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
There's no way he meant that.
But I guess its karma for his own personal dipshit Covid competition / party he hosted with no active protocols in place, and hey-ho - caught Covid himself (amongst several other competitors). Bit of a bell.
But I guess its karma for his own personal dipshit Covid competition / party he hosted with no active protocols in place, and hey-ho - caught Covid himself (amongst several other competitors). Bit of a bell.
Razzoo
Well-known member
It's hard to tell for sure, it does look like the judge makes a meal of it.
Derbyshire Seagull
Active member
- Oct 21, 2005
- 565
- Thread starter
- #9
he had already hit the ball in anger a bit earlier.
He apparently said during the chat with the referee .....
She doesn't have to go to the hospital for this." -Djokovic trying to downplay the effects of hitting the lineswoman, saying she wasn't seriously injured.
Djokovic continuining:
"You're going to choose a default in this situation? My career, grand slam, center stage"
He deserves what he gets for this and whether it was intentional is irrelevant.
He apparently said during the chat with the referee .....
She doesn't have to go to the hospital for this." -Djokovic trying to downplay the effects of hitting the lineswoman, saying she wasn't seriously injured.
Djokovic continuining:
"You're going to choose a default in this situation? My career, grand slam, center stage"
He deserves what he gets for this and whether it was intentional is irrelevant.
studio150
Well-known member
She will be counting the dollars from the lawsuit.
She went down easier than Grealish does, which is really saying something. No doubt already complaining of dizziness, loss of memory, pain and now has a fear of tennis balls so will have to give up her job. $10m should settle the claim.
Randy McNob
Now go home and get your f#cking Shinebox
- Jun 13, 2020
- 4,449
I remember Henman getting disqualified for hitting a ball boy, albeit not intentional
rules are rules
rules are rules
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,287
Gonna go out on a limb here as I really was a kid and I don’t want to cheat and look but I think it was a ball GIRL and he was playing doubles with Jeremy Bates and very young lad himself...!?
Ooh it’s a corner
Well-known member
Huge overreaction and he clearly didn’t mean to do it. However IF that is the rule then his fault for not thinking what could happen. He was perhaps just unlucky. I do think he comes over as more arrogant than the other two greats of the modern era and personally view him as behind them both in GOAT considerations. I’m not sure you can compare with players from a completely different era such as Rocket Rod because the game has changed so much
Music City Gull
Not Changing This, Bozza
(Digress-ing) Makes me think of David Mitchell (a personal hero of mine) going after Henman against his future wife on WILTY. Love that show.
Dawg wtf
The ref (or whatever its called in tennis) being a bit aspergian in his rule interpretation is one thing and I agree he could have let it go, but even a certainly strong manly man like you would probably have got hurt and/or shocked if Djokovic smashed a ball, with some decent force, on your throat while you were unprepared.
At least she’ll be able to tell her grandkids about the day Djokovic’s balls were bouncing off her chin.
What?
What?
portlock seagull
Why? Why us?
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,069
Ref making headlines never a good thing. He’s an idiot for making that ruling.
Juan Albion
Chicken Sniffer 3rd Class
It was hardly a smash and there was no appreciable force. Hit in the throat, though, is always going to be nasty. But it is irrelevant how he hit her, the rules said he had to go.
Have a look at it from overhead......plenty enough force
https://twitter.com/sbrennernews/status/1302716762660548609?s=21