Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] I didn't come here for a lecture in Communism



Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,713
West west west Sussex
The disease and cure of human existence summed up in 44 seconds.

[tweet]1287660088497451008[/tweet]
 










highflyer

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2016
2,435
But he's not offered an alternative, he just stated how he would like it to be not how it could be achieved.

This is very true. And it's tricky.

But if you take what he says as the starting point, as any sane person would, you definitely wouldn't design the system we have.

There are plenty of alternatives on offer, but I suspect what we need is something different again, which needs to evolve once we've all worked out, and accepted he is right.
 






Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,713
West west west Sussex
But he's not offered an alternative, he just stated how he would like it to be not how it could be achieved.

He went on to lay out a foolproof road map to Utopia but that took the clip just beyond the one minute mark so it got edited out.
 








wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,624
Melbourne
He went on to lay out a foolproof road map to Utopia but that took the clip just beyond the one minute mark so it got edited out.

A foolproof roadmap to Utopia you say?

Now, I’m all ears.............
 










Braggfan

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded
May 12, 2014
1,833
I'm assuming your intention was to make sure this tread went to the Bear Pit ? Typical Tory !

I think there was a fair chance this thread was always going to attract some cynicism, its a political thread.
 




dingodan

New member
Feb 16, 2011
10,080
The real question is how do you get there?

There are really only two ways.

A free people who discover for themselves the neccessity of taking responsibility and then who live their lives with that in mind, setting a good example to their neighbours while respecting the fact that their neighbours too need to discover these things for themselves, and attempting to assist in that with respectful attempts to convince, using civil debate and discussion, involving listening to one another and holding respect for the individuality and autonomy of all people as something neccessary of vigilant protection, understanding that all of what is needed cannot be properly achieved without it.

Or a totalitarian system, where a central group of authority figures decide what is required by all and ensure it with force. Where people do what is required not because they understand and have integrated it's neccessity, but merely because they fear the repercussions of disobediance. Where you shame and marginalize and stigmatize your neighbours if they are not on the same page, where debate and discussion is scolding and doesn't involve listening, rather it involves shouting louder than the other person. Where indiviuality and autonomy is the enemy, in the belief that uniformity is the only means of achieving what is neccessary.

We have accepted the former and rejected the latter.

Let's keep it that way please.
 


sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,752
town full of eejits
Q: How it could be achieved?
A: Don't vote Tory

all politicians are the same , capitalism is the only way forward with the worlds population at over 7 billion what is everyone going to eat , how will acquire it , how are thy going to get everywhere without their cars , petrol , tyres....?? it's a beautiful sentiment and eloquently put by a man who is clearly quite well educated but it will never work unless post apocalyptically with a global population of way less than one billion.....you can't blame a handful of university educated bell ends on a small island off the coast of Europe for a global economy that has whored itself out to the banks and capitalism.
 










Hampster Gull

New member
Dec 22, 2010
13,462
The real question is how do you get there?

There are really only two ways.

A free people who discover for themselves the neccessity of taking responsibility and then who live their lives with that in mind, setting a good example to their neighbours while respecting the fact that their neighbours too need to discover these things for themselves, and attempting to assist in that with respectful attempts to convince, using civil debate and discussion, involving listening to one another and holding respect for the individuality and autonomy of all people as something neccessary of vigilant protection, understanding that all of what is needed cannot be properly achieved without it.

Or a totalitarian system, where a central group of authority figures decide what is required by all and ensure it with force. Where people do what is required not because they understand and have integrated it's neccessity, but merely because they fear the repercussions of disobediance. Where you shame and marginalize and stigmatize your neighbours if they are not on the same page, where debate and discussion is scolding and doesn't involve listening, rather it involves shouting louder than the other person. Where indiviuality and autonomy is the enemy, in the belief that uniformity is the only means of achieving what is neccessary.

We have accepted the former and rejected the latter.

Let's keep it that way please.

Agree, let’s keep it that way. Unless I can be the totalitarian leader
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here