A la last week's penalty thread.
WTF was that all about?
WTF was that all about?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Reviewing Red Card Decision
- Thread starter Stat Brother
- Start date
Maupay missed the ball and connected with the player standing on the line’s shin (said player got the ball a fraction of a second before Maupay). Was never a red but looked worse in slow motion.
Hmmmm. Verrry close to red say most pundits . Got the luck again today
father_and_son
Well-known member
VAR *must* start to show something in the stadium. When the fans have no idea which side is even going to get the red something is very wrong!
My commentary was in Japanese or Chinese so no idea what their views were!
BN41Albion
Well-known member
- Oct 1, 2017
- 6,401
Ridiculous that it's not stated what it's for on the screens. Was impossible to see from where we were in the north with all the chaos going on in the box, so was complete confusion as to which team they were reviewing the decision for, let alone player!
Lush
Mods' Pet
But if it looked worse in slow motion and it’s shown on the big screen it puts pressure on the ref to give it.
Iggle Piggle
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2010
- 5,318
There were 2 angles of this. 1 was inconclusive, the other made it look dirty. On the replays I was watching at the time they only showed the first inconclusive angle. After the decision was made, the 2nd was shown which made it look far worse.
Another day its a red card.
Another day its a red card.
Change at Barnham
Well-known member
It looked a nasty foul by Maupay. I don't think we could have complained if it was a red.
If it had been a challenge by an opposition player on one of our lads we would have been all over it tonight.
It's a bit of good fortune we needed after the two previous unnecessary red cards we conceded this season.
If it had been a challenge by an opposition player on one of our lads we would have been all over it tonight.
It's a bit of good fortune we needed after the two previous unnecessary red cards we conceded this season.
Postman Pat
Well-known member
Naylor thought it was on Godfrey, Norwich fans cheered as though it was a Norwich player involved.
Ludicrous that we have no idea which player/team are involved in the stadium.
Ludicrous that we have no idea which player/team are involved in the stadium.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 70,153
Looked quite amusing on the replays in the concourse. Player went to ground clutching his ankle. Then leapt to his feet to confront Maupay. Then went to ground again for a bit more rolling around
Bwian
Kiss my (_!_)
- Jul 14, 2003
- 15,898
I felt the same today. He was far more likely to favour Norwich.
Sent from my LYA-L09 using Tapatalk
BensGrandad
New member
On the radio they said it was for a possible handball on the goal line by a Norwich player but nobody in the ground knew what was happening and what the VAR was for.
Anither day, another absolute SHAMBLES for VAR. Fans in the stadium utterly clueless as to why (my son asked me to check what it was for at half time) and it seems that the on field referee, the VAR referee and experienced pundits cannnot agree on the correct decision after all that.
Time to bin it off.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 30,566
For me it was a yellow. Lad in the bar afterwards watching the highlights thought VAR was checking a handball, he was watching slo mo and still didn't have a clue what VAR was checking. Another week, another mess.
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
Except the VAR review was for a red card?
- Thread starter
- #20
I got the impression the Norwich fans didn't know what was going on either.