Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 91
  1. #31
    Members the right footed denilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    6,720


    0 Not allowed!
    Name:  218890.JPG
Views: 411
Size:  90.2 KB
    Here's one (presumably not the one, as this is more shirt lifting that pulling- actually probably is as it's the last 'action' shot on Reuters)
    Dan Burn is going to be getting this kind of thing all season.
    How long? Not long
    Because what you reap, is what you sow.

    • North Stand Chat

      advertising
      Join Date: Jul 2003
      Posts: Lots

        


    • #32
      Resident pedant Triggaaar's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Goldstone
      Posts
      42,597


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Sussex Nomad View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      They only seem to care about chalking goals off, not giving them.
      The opposite to the Women's WC. Maybe we're seeing an over-reaction against that, as that was pretty dreadful.
      Thank you Chris, you're a legend.
    • #33
      Members
      Join Date
      Mar 2019
      Location
      Bitchin' in Hitchin
      Posts
      834


      0 Not allowed!
      I think this comes down to the interpretation of usage, the ref decides when it's the appropriate 'phase of play'. It lacks clarification, who uses it and when. Does the VAR refs in the control decide when to use it, or the referee?
    • #34
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2010
      Location
      EP
      Posts
      17,764


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Triggaaar View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      The opposite to the Women's WC. Maybe we're seeing an over-reaction against that, as that was pretty dreadful.
      Can't deny I didn't watch the woman thing. But VAR worked ok at the World Cup was it? It was a major mens tournament. It just seems like utter shit in the Prem.
    • #35
      Resident pedant Triggaaar's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Goldstone
      Posts
      42,597


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Sussex Nomad View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Can't deny I didn't watch the woman thing.
      I didn't see much of it, but I think they were giving penalties whenever the ball got near a defenders hand.

      But VAR worked ok at the World Cup was it? It was a major mens tournament.
      I thought so.
      It just seems like utter shit in the Prem.
      When I read the new rules, I thought this should be an improvement on the men's WC, but it's looking like (and we're only 2 games in) they're not going to give penalties that should be given (as Acker said might be the case). But I haven't actually seen the footage of Burn's penalty claim, so I'll hold full judgement.

      If it really is a disaster, they'll change it.

      We also need to stop showing 'goal' on the big screens until after the VAR check is complete.
      Thank you Chris, you're a legend.
    • #36
      Resident pedant Triggaaar's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Goldstone
      Posts
      42,597


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by SollysLeftFoot View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      I think this comes down to the interpretation of usage, the ref decides when it's the appropriate 'phase of play'. It lacks clarification, who uses it and when. Does the VAR refs in the control decide when to use it, or the referee?
      The VAR refs in the control centre decide. I don't even think the ref is allowed to call for it. He gives decisions as best he can, and VAR corrects him when it's a howler (of 1mm offside).
      Thank you Chris, you're a legend.
    • #37

      1 Not allowed!
      For those of you who didn't see it:

    • #38

      1 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by wealdgull View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      For those of you who didn't see it:

      I was reserving judgement until I had seen it again.

      I at first thought it looked a stonewall pen. But looking at this replay it isn't a penalty at all, very little in it....
      Palace fan -
      Why did my Dad introduce me to Palace. Life is even more depressing
      ITS THE STUFF OF CHAMPIONS, ITS THE STUFF OF DREAMS
    • #39
      Im The Scatman
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      hassocks
      Posts
      49,905


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Triggaaar View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      The opposite to the Women's WC. Maybe we're seeing an over-reaction against that, as that was pretty dreadful.
      Beat me to it.
    • #40
      Members
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Posts
      1,025


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Triggaaar View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Perhaps the refs are letting things go, relying on VAR to call it if it was a foul. Meanwhile, the VAR officials are thinking 'that looks like a penalty, but the ref has seen it and thought it wasn't enough to warrant a penalty, and it's not a big enough error for us to overturn it'.

      It's going to take some time until they get it working well.
      It will never work well. You have technology subject to human error each time

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •