Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Does visiting the new-build WHL really count as a new ground ticked off?



C5wqvRtWgAAisZW.jpg

If it was built on a different site then undoubtedly so, but they do overlap and even the pitches overlap slightly in which case, can it really be counted as a new ground visited?
You wouldn't count the Molineux of the 1970s as a different ground simply because it's since had four new stands and the pitch moved a stand's width to one side.
 






Poojah

Well-known member
Nov 19, 2010
1,881
Leeds
It’s a bit of a contentious one this. I’d say that it counts on the basis that that more than 50% of both old and new structures existed at the same time - that’s not possible if you’re simply redeveloping a ground.
 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,300
yes, only thing the same is the address.
 




Tokyohands

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2017
940
Tokyo
Yes of course. If you knocked down your house and built a new one on the same site you'd be inviting people round to your new house and I doubt your friends would be questioning if it really is a new house or not.
 




Guy Fawkes

The voice of treason
Sep 29, 2007
8,197
Yes of course. If you knocked down your house and built a new one on the same site you'd be inviting people round to your new house and I doubt your friends would be questioning if it really is a new house or not.

Not quite in this case, more like knocking down your house, and also 3 other neighbouring properties and building a new house on the combined footprint of those 4 sites. There is no way that the end result could be mistaken for the old house so of course it counts as a new ground.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here