[Albion] CH “we weren’t good enough”

sussex_guy2k2 said:

It's not inexplicable at all. CH got tactically outsmarted on Saturday and that was painfully obvious within 5 minutes of the game starting. They pushed up, compressing the game and with no outlet ball in behind and a flat 5, we couldn't play past the first press. They let Duffy have as much of the ball as he wanted because they know thee guy can't pass for toffee beyond a 5 yard ball to either his CB partner or our RB, but they then pressed in groups against our most effective ball players. We allowed them to do that by starting with the personnel we had and the flat midfield we started with. Saturday's on CH and the fact that he didn't change the shape until the 70th minute is an insult to fans quite frankly.

Click to expand...

sussex_guy2k2 said:

You've totally contradicted yourself. Go back and read the two bits I've highlighted.

Click to expand...

Easy 10 said:

I'm sorry, but when you settle back and give the opposition the freedom of the park, all you have left is last-ditch blocks on their shots, as we were literally inviting them onto us, into our final third. The workrate and intensity to win the ball back simply wasn't there. The whole team needed to player about 15 yards further forward, get in their faces and apply pressure on them BEFORE they got deep into our half. There was none of that.

Then when we did get the ball, the lack of movement gave us precious little in forward options. Duffy at times was visibly exasperated when he had the ball at his feet and looked up. Invariably he'd either go sideways, or end up playing a 50 yard punt in the vague direction of an isolated Murray, who'd flick it on to no-one, and Southampton would build again. It was dogshit football, and if we repeat it in the next 2 games, then I really fear for us.

Click to expand...

Eric Youngs Contact Lense said:

I don't need to go back and read it thanks - I wrote it. You interpret it as a contradiction - it may be badly written - apologies. A high press is a tactical choice. That Southampton dropped deeper after the goal was not a tactical choice I suspect, rather an unintended reaction to the game. Our lack of a high press is a tactical choice - not a result of a lack of effort which I think others were suggesting in their comments - my interpretation of course which may also be wrong. Does that help?

Click to expand...

Weststander said:

Agree with that. We will soon run out of the luxury of having 3 even poorer teams in the PL. It's time to alter strategy/direction a little, and bring in two or three exceptional players, who can influence PL games. Watford is a good example of achieving that, without doing 'an Everton' in bunging £100m's at the problem.

Click to expand...

Machiavelli said:

Agree, but there are rumours that a few players have a highest earner clause in their contract. Of those I've heard, the only one I'd want to keep if we were to bring in some expensive (and therefore well remunerated) signings is Dunk and, even then, most clubs don't have CB as a highest earner.

Click to expand...

Weststander said:

We’ll never know, but if true, we’ll just have to pay more.

We will eventually run out of luck that there are three shittier squads in the PL. For example, last season Everton and West Ham spent many months in the relegation mix, giving us a wider field of poor teams. This season they’ve both spent incredible sums, buying themselves out of that pool. (I’m not saying we need to do that, just that we’ve competing to avoid relegation with fewer clubs).

The quality of our first team, especially centre midfield, needs to improve markedly next time around.

Click to expand...

Eric Youngs Contact Lense said:

I don't need to go back and read it thanks - I wrote it. You interpret it as a contradiction - it may be badly written - apologies. A high press is a tactical choice. That Southampton dropped deeper after the goal was not a tactical choice I suspect, rather an unintended reaction to the game. Our lack of a high press is a tactical choice - not a result of a lack of effort which I think others were suggesting in their comments - my interpretation of course which may also be wrong. Does that help?

Click to expand...