Page 129 of 367 FirstFirst ... 2979119126127128129130131132139179229 ... LastLast
Results 1,281 to 1,290 of 3668
  1. #1281
    Members Bevendean Hillbilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nestling in green nowhere
    Posts
    12,492


    1 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Se20 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Good old Arsenal TV !!
    If they want Wilf, pay what Palace want for him, if not he stays put.
    You can’t lower the valuation because you’ve only got a £45 mill budget, with £25 mill apparently earmarked for Tierney at Celtic.
    The “valuation” is inflated though. Even you must accept that trying to pass on the 25% you owe Manchester United to whoever buys him is the issue? Wilf certainly knows it, Arsenal know it...EVERYONE knows it bacause Parish has skilfully told us that’s what he’s trying to do.
    I've killed women and children. I've killed everything that walks or crawls at one time or another. And I'm here to kill you, Little Bill Archer, for what you done to The Seagulls.

    • North Stand Chat

      advertising
      Join Date: Jul 2003
      Posts: Lots

        


    • #1282
      Members Se20's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2012
      Posts
      3,547


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Bevendean Hillbilly View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      The “valuation” is inflated though. Even you must accept that trying to pass on the 25% you owe Manchester United to whoever buys him is the issue? Wilf certainly knows it, Arsenal know it...EVERYONE knows it bacause Parish has skilfully told us that’s what he’s trying to do.
      Selling and buying clubs will have different valuations, that happens in every deal.
      Will Palace drop their valuation? Probably.
      Have Arsenal actually made an offer though ? It’s all little leaks to the press.
      Fortunately for Palace, he’s on a long contract, so Arsenal need to up the ante.
      My feelings are he will go, with a Arsenal player or two part of the deal.
      Scoring goals for Palace
      John Terry John Terry
    • #1283
      Members Albion my Albion's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2016
      Location
      Darlington, UK
      Posts
      7,927


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by spanish flair View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      The fact that this troll you are calling a boy is 54 years old, although he does post like a kid
      I've found that thinking young and immature is sometimes the key to staying young in mind.

      Whoa! That was way too profound for someone of my thinking age.


      P.S. The immaturity of incessantly talking about your main rivals star is so impressive.
      Quote Originally Posted by ac gull View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      common sense is not actually that common these days
    • #1284
      Members Stat Brother's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2003
      Location
      West west west Sussex
      Posts
      51,156


      1 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Bevendean Hillbilly View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      The “valuation” is inflated though. Even you must accept that trying to pass on the 25% you owe Manchester United to whoever buys him is the issue? Wilf certainly knows it, Arsenal know it...EVERYONE knows it bacause Parish has skilfully told us that’s what he’s trying to do.
      palace sold him for £10m.
      Bought him back for £3m.

      palace have received somewhere in the region £500,000,000 pretty much on the back of that decision.

      They are now attempting to snivel their way out of paying Utd a further £15m, on a deal they agreed.

      How much would Utd have sold Tumble for was a 10% sell on clause?


      Stay classy.
      “Melancholy is incompatible with bicycling.” James E Starrs
      Rarely serious, frequently taken seriously.

      .
    • #1285
      ID10T Error dadams2k11's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2011
      Location
      Brighton
      Posts
      3,245


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Se20 View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Selling and buying clubs will have different valuations, that happens in every deal.
      Will Palace drop their valuation? Probably.
      Have Arsenal actually made an offer though ? It’s all little leaks to the press.
      Fortunately for Palace, he’s on a long contract, so Arsenal need to up the ante.
      My feelings are he will go, with a Arsenal player or two part of the deal.
      Yea because contract means something these days in football.

      Just hope you and the rest of the goons come over to discuss the transfer if he goes.

      Probably not tho as we didn't see any of you for ages after we beat you home and away last season.
    • #1286
      Devil's Advocate (p/t)
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Brighton
      Posts
      25,940


      0 Not allowed!
      I find it hard to believe Arsenal have only £45m to spend. It wasn't that long ago there were reports Man Utd only had £100m available this window. They've already spent 45m, and are looking at other high price targets. It's all part of the game; 'x team (that has massive spending power/have sold player for large amount) only has so much to spend.' - all an attempt to stop selling teams inflating their prices. Palace may suffer from this when they try to buy players - 'they just got up to 50m for AWB! They can afford it, let's push them more!' And it'll get worse if they sell Zaha for even half of what they think he's worth.

      Last season the reports were that Arsenal's purse strings would loosen in the summer because their previous restrictive sponsorship deals were coming to an end, and there would be big money deals to be made this summer giving them a lot more freedom.

      It's probably also worth noting the way these fees work (and el pres wouldcan correct any errors on this)... It's entirely possible that Utd's 100m isn't all that inaccurate, but is being talked about in terms of the split of fees over contract lengths. i.e. AWB was signed on a 4 year deal with an option of a 5th year. 45m/5 years means they've only spent 9m this year. Similarly, if Arsenal sign Zaha to a 4 year deal at 60m, that could only count for 15m of their 45m to spend this summer. It all depends on how these spend figures are being spun by the people leaking them.
      Please report offensive or libellous posts - read more
    • #1287
      Members
      Join Date
      Jan 2004
      Posts
      2,169


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Acker79 View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      I find it hard to believe Arsenal have only £45m to spend. It wasn't that long ago there were reports Man Utd only had £100m available this window. They've already spent 45m, and are looking at other high price targets. It's all part of the game; 'x team (that has massive spending power/have sold player for large amount) only has so much to spend.' - all an attempt to stop selling teams inflating their prices. Palace may suffer from this when they try to buy players - 'they just got up to 50m for AWB! They can afford it, let's push them more!' And it'll get worse if they sell Zaha for even half of what they think he's worth.

      Last season the reports were that Arsenal's purse strings would loosen in the summer because their previous restrictive sponsorship deals were coming to an end, and there would be big money deals to be made this summer giving them a lot more freedom.

      It's probably also worth noting the way these fees work (and el pres wouldcan correct any errors on this)... It's entirely possible that Utd's 100m isn't all that inaccurate, but is being talked about in terms of the split of fees over contract lengths. i.e. AWB was signed on a 4 year deal with an option of a 5th year. 45m/5 years means they've only spent 9m this year. Similarly, if Arsenal sign Zaha to a 4 year deal at 60m, that could only count for 15m of their 45m to spend this summer. It all depends on how these spend figures are being spun by the people leaking them.
      Hmmm... I think The Gooners budget is tight, and Zaha would blow their budget...


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      We will rise again at Falmer... like a phoenix from the ashes of the Goldstone RIP...
    • #1288

      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Se20 View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      Arsenal can’t even afford £60 mill.
      Maybe Arsenal TV should start up a Justgiving page.
      if zaha goes will you go down?
      Last edited by rogersix; 30-06-2019 at 10:38.
    • #1289
      Members papajaff's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Brighton
      Posts
      3,093


      0 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by spanish flair View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      The fact that this troll you are calling a boy is 54 years old, although he does post like a kid
      A confused man then. Is he really a Palace fan wanting to convert to the good side?
      Visiting NYC? Please get to Foleys on 33rd Street between 5th and 6th Avenue. My mates bar and very Albion / sport friendly.
    • #1290
      Members Bevendean Hillbilly's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Nestling in green nowhere
      Posts
      12,492


      3 Not allowed!
      Quote Originally Posted by Stat Brother View Post
      This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
      palace sold him for £10m.
      Bought him back for £3m.

      palace have received somewhere in the region £500,000,000 pretty much on the back of that decision.

      They are now attempting to snivel their way out of paying Utd a further £15m, on a deal they agreed.

      How much would Utd have sold Tumble for was a 10% sell on clause?


      Stay classy.
      Herein lies the issue. It speaks to just how much of a wide boy Steve Parish is.

      No one involved in a negotiation involving future asset worth...and I mean no one credible...would enter into a deal where, to save a couple of million pounds up front you essentially tie your asset up in a 25% sell on.

      If Parish had any sense he would have asked United what price they would accept to AVOID a 25% future share clause. I imagine that would have been 10 million as that would mean they had recovered their investment.

      So. For 7 million pounds Palace have now lost (even at 60 million ACTUAL value)and the 25% sell on, essentially, £15million.

      Well done you utter tool. Was it worth your best player now begging you to let him go? Resenting you for thwarting his career?

      Knowing what we know of Wilfs “poor me” victim mongering attitude it is highly likely he will now decide to force your hand by going on strike, getting “injured” and generally acting the cock. I’m looking forward to this season now.
      Last edited by Bevendean Hillbilly; 30-06-2019 at 10:42.
      I've killed women and children. I've killed everything that walks or crawls at one time or another. And I'm here to kill you, Little Bill Archer, for what you done to The Seagulls.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •