http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/15908880.Ian_Hart__An_apology/
I understand they may also have made a charity payment by way of apology.
I understand they may also have made a charity payment by way of apology.
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/15908880.Ian_Hart__An_apology/
I understand they may also have made a charity payment by way of apology.
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/15908880.Ian_Hart__An_apology/
I understand they may also have made a charity payment by way of apology.
Cats up trees in Worthing? I'll be round shortly with my shot gun
I couldn’t see the donation mentioned in the article? Is this fact or conjecture, I wouldn’t want you getting into trouble sir....
Why did they need to give him an apology? (I don't read The Arsegas.)
If you read the link in the original post it explains that a significant element in the online version oc the story, was untrue
Woeful bit of journalism. The incident was of no interest to anyone in the first place. To then get it so badly wrong is pathetic. Glad they have had to back down and the charities have benefited as a result.
If you read the link in the original post it explains that a significant element in the online version oc the story, was untrue