[Football] Points per game 2017

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

10,667

• Nov 23, 2017

• #1

I heard a rumour that after their incredible feat of being the worst performing team in 2016, Palace were on track to repeat the feat in 2017.

Does anyone know if this is true?
If so, where would one be able to locate the relevant table?

 

WhingForPresident

.

NSC Patron

Feb 23, 2009

16,189

Marlborough

• Nov 23, 2017

• #2

West Brom are currently one point below them for 2017, though they have played one less.

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/jahrestabelle/wettbewerb/GB1

 

J

Jimmehh

Well-known member

Mar 21, 2016

758

Sussex by the Sea

• Nov 23, 2017

• #3

Sunderland have unfortunately only got 21 points in 2017, compared to the 30 for Palarse, so unlikely.

 

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

10,667

• Nov 23, 2017

• Thread starter
• #4

Jimmehh said:

Sunderland have unfortunately only got 21 points in 2017, compared to the 30 for Palarse, so unlikely.

Click to expand...

That is disappointing..
oh well. Better luck next year.

 

Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster

Jul 5, 2003

72,015

• Nov 23, 2017

• #5

Hope this thread doesn’t come back to bite us on the bum after Tuesday’s game

 

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

10,667

• Nov 23, 2017

• Thread starter
• #6

Icy Gull said:

Hope this thread doesn’t come back to bite us on the bum after Tuesday’s game

Click to expand...

It is fairly unusual that this close to the game, that NSC isn't swarming with them....
They will be out in force if the worse case scenario happens....

However the amount of points they have achieved in 2017 will still not be something they will have over us.

 

Uh_huh_him

Well-known member

Sep 28, 2011

10,667

• Nov 23, 2017

• Thread starter
• #7

It is one of the things that irks me about Palace.
There is a very common point of view that Palace have a squad that should not be in a relegation fight.
I've heard it from various pundits and the like.

And yet for two years solid they have achieved less than a point per game.

 

P

Petee

Well-known member

Nov 22, 2010

3,031

Brighton

• Nov 23, 2017

• #8

Tried working it out for all leagues and the main results are below:-

Based on points

Top 10
1 Sheff Utd 86
2 Accrington Stanley 78
3 Luton 77
4 Cardiff 75
=5 Exeter 74
=5 Lincoln 74
=5 Portsmouth 74
=8 Bradford 73
=8 Man City 73
=8 Tottenham 73

Bottom 12
=85 Rotherham 36
=85 Stoke 36
=85 Watford 36
=86 Bournemouth 35
=86 Southampton 35
88 Birmingham 33
=89 Chesterfield 32
=89 Leyton Orient 32
=89 West Ham 32
92 Crystal Palace 30
93 West Brom 29
94 Sunderland 21

We are joint 35th with 58 points

Based on Points per game

Top 10
1 Man City 2.35
2 Tottenham 2.28
3 Chelsea 2.23
4 Sheff Utd 2.15
5 Man Utd 1.90
6 Arsenal 1.88
7 Accrington Stanley 1.86
8 Lincoln 1.85
9 Luton 1.83
10 Cardiff 1.83

Bottom 10
85 Yeovil 0.95
86 Gillingham 0.95
87 Crystal Palace 0.94
88 West Brom 0.94
89 Port Vale 0.90
90 Rotherham 0.90
91 Birmingham 0.83
92 Chesterfield 0.78
93 Leyton Orient 0.73
94 Sunderland 0.57

We are 21st with 1.66

 

Moshe Gariani

Well-known member

Mar 10, 2005

12,071

• Nov 23, 2017

• #9

Uh_huh_him said:

It is one of the things that irks me about Palace.
There is a very common point of view that Palace have a squad that should not be in a relegation fight.
I've heard it from various pundits and the like.

And yet for two years solid they have achieved less than a point per game.

Click to expand...

I know Palace's achievement is connected to calendar years and not playing seasons but the "less than a point per game without being relegated" thing is significant.

People keep going on about us needing 40 points but in fact 37 points (especially with the GD factor) is very, very likely to be enough.

The bedsheets of Sussex are going through a dry patch but a time will come when aiming at 37 rather than 40 will feel much more encouraging.