3 at the back ??

Churchy

Member

Jun 1, 2008

91

South Wales

• Aug 31, 2017

• #1

With us looking at signing more defenders on deadline day is Chris Hughton looking a maybe changing formation and going for 3 at the back ??

 

Triggaaar

Well-known member

Oct 24, 2005

50,167

Goldstone

• Aug 31, 2017

• #2

I think you'll find it's 10 at the back.

 

Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...

Mar 18, 2010

29,789

Hove

• Aug 31, 2017

• #3

Well, may as well 3 at the back because we ain't got enough for 3 up front...

 

JJ McClure

Go Jags

Jul 7, 2003

10,836

Hassocks

• Aug 31, 2017

• #4

It seems to be a pretty popular formation at the moment.

 

S

SussexSeahawk

New member

Jun 2, 2016

152

• Aug 31, 2017

• #5

JJ McClure said:

It seems to be a pretty popular formation at the moment.

Click to expand...

We have too many wide attacking players for this to work. It certainly wouldn't suit Izquierdo. Also the fact we were trying to loan out Goldson implies this isn't really a numbers thing: just trying to get cover so that we can let Goldson get some games.

 

AmexRuislip

Trainee Spy 🕵️‍♂️

Feb 2, 2014

33,801

Ruislip

• Aug 31, 2017

• #6

1 from the top and ten from the back

 

patchamalbion

Well-known member

Feb 26, 2009

6,011

brighton

• Aug 31, 2017

• #7

More likely to be the Middlesbrough approach and the 9-1 formation!

 

studio150

Well-known member

Jul 30, 2011

29,611

On the Border

• Aug 31, 2017

• #8

a 5 rather than a 3 if any change from the usual 4