0

How about bollox.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That's another way to describe it, but @darkwolf666 was a bit more eloquent.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
BBC2 Newnight featuring this tonight.
A brave victim from Rotherham has said Yaxley-Lennon did not expose the grooming scandals.
When people are rude to you, they reveal who they are, not who you are.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Oh case closed then , one victim out of thousands says he didnt in a biased broadcasting corporation interview so it must be true .This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It is literally pointless arguing with these people. They can not, and probably more likely will not accept the simple fact that their glorious leader broke the law. Then broke it again after being specifically warned NOT to. If he goes back inside, they'll probably cause trouble in London again and the British public will get another bill. Free speech my arse.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It's beneath contempt the way he uses child abuse to push his agenda/celebrity cult.
With all due respect we should be beating teams like Brighton.
Seriously. Hope the women can get out of the country.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Christian.html
Its pointless arguing with pillocks like you who try and deflect from the issue at hand , which is whether he exposed or was one of a few who brought grooming gangs to public attention, which he did .This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
No he didn't.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It was all over the news way before he got involved.
I'd heard of him because of his EDL stuff and his attempts to reinvent himself.
I'd heard about these grooming gangs because of the people who actually exposed them. The social workers who were ignored and the other people on the coal face of the situation.
They brought to public attention the inadequacies of the police and the whole system.
He jumped on the bandwagon as he always does. He's brought nothing to the cause whatsoever but bigotry and ham fisted attempts to look like a hero, while actually damaging the chances of these scumbags being convicted.
You've swallowed it hook line and sinker. Fair enough, but stop telling people that they don't understand "the issue at hand" when they do.
Exactly thisThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Stephen has simply used the Facebook pretext that, unless you specifically complain about something, you’re in favour of it to try to push himself. Only a half wit would fall for it.
I don’t see many Catholic Church officials being investigated. When’s he moving on to them?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/spuriousThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I read a few pages of this thread and find it very odd.
Tommy Robinson Didn't uncover the grooming scandal, it was though burried by the establishment for decades and who would like it to go away. By highlighting the problem he prevents this from happening which his supporters like given their level of mistrust of the Government.
Secondly why do posters persist in calling TR S. L-Y? Yes he is using a synonmy, yes everyone knows it now and no it wont change anything. After all every poster in this thread is doing the same, its quite normal in this age of internet.
Maybe you need to send that one back up the pipe or are you being Ironic or NPC?
Bookmarks