Leicester's penalty disallowed as struck twice by the taker. The first player to appeal was a city player parallel with the taker hence he must have encroached by a mile. His being the first offence the penalty should have been retaken.
Leicester's penalty disallowed as struck twice by the taker. The first player to appeal was a city player parallel with the taker hence he must have encroached by a mile. His being the first offence the penalty should have been retaken.
How was Sterling NOT offside for City's first goal?
P.s., only watching this pony football to scout Yoyo Tory. Long in the tooth,eh?
Deemed not to have interfered with play, much like his career.
Deemed not to have interfered with play, much like his career.
That is always a strage remark as he attempted to hit it but missed. To quote Brian Clough if a players is on the pitch he is influencing play if not he shouldnt be on there.