Qatar spending $500m a week on World Cup infrastructure projects

T

TomandJerry

Well-known member

Oct 1, 2013

11,462

• Feb 8, 2017

• #1

Qatar is spending almost $500m (£400m) a week on major infrastructure projects as it prepares for the 2022 Fifa World Cup, its finance minister has said.

Ali al-Emadi expected spending to continue at that level for three to four years as new stadiums, motorways, rail links and hospitals are built.

More than $200bn (£160bn) will be spent in total by the gas-rich emirate.

But Mr Emadi denied that the plans would make the 2022 tournament the most expensive World Cup yet.

The 2014 World Cup in Brazil is reported to have cost $11bn (£8.8bn) to host, while Russia increased government spending on the 2018 World Cup by $321m to $10.7bn.

 

lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969

Jun 11, 2011

13,723

Worthing

• Feb 8, 2017

• #2

They'll never comply withFFP

 

beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius

Jul 21, 2003

35,310

• Feb 8, 2017

• #3

bit odd to boast the spending then deny the extravagance. good luck to them, if thats what they want to spend their money on, would have though spending a chunk on other causes might have been more worthwhile, but heyho. will still be a shite tournament in the heat and no drinking.

 

AmexRuislip

Trainee Spy 🕵️‍♂️

Feb 2, 2014

33,808

Ruislip

• Feb 8, 2017

• #4

To top it all, Mike Dean is the special guest to ref (ruin) the final.

 

Wrong-Direction

Well-known member

Mar 10, 2013

13,419

• Feb 8, 2017

• #5

Corrupt corrupt corrupt.

Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk

 

Simster

"the man's an arse"

Jul 7, 2003

54,198

Surrey

• Feb 8, 2017

• #6

I'm not sure Brazilians or even Russians should be quite so happy with the amount of money that was/is being thrown at those tournaments. At least Qatar can actually afford it, although nothing is going to stop it being the shittest world cup imaginable. Not even money.

 

T

turienzo's lovechild

New member

Oct 25, 2003

23,964

• Feb 8, 2017

• #7

saving a fortune on construction staff wages though to be fair- very THRIFTY when it comes to that

 

Prince Monolulu

Everything in Moderation

Oct 2, 2013

10,201

The Race Hill

• Feb 8, 2017

• #8

A Christmas, sorry WINTER HOLIDAY World Cup, it just ain't gonna work.

 

T

turienzo's lovechild

New member

Oct 25, 2003

23,964

• Feb 8, 2017

• #9

I really think that FIFA need to stop giving the world cup to countries that pretty much have to start from scratch when it comes to building stadiums. Stadiums (stadia?) are really expensive and are only vaguely worth it if there's enough interest in the domestic game to be able to fill them post-world cup (Germany is a good example of this). South Africa and Brazil both spent shit loads on arenas, many of which are now pretty much redundant- both countries that could ill afford expensive unnecessary expenditure on that scale.

 

SUIYHP

The King's Gull

Apr 16, 2009

1,899

Inside Southwick Tunnel

• Feb 8, 2017

• #10

Could've and should've been England. That is all.

 

T

turienzo's lovechild

New member

Oct 25, 2003

23,964

• Feb 8, 2017

• #11

SUIYHP said:

Could've and should've been England. That is all.

Click to expand...

England went for 2018. Qatar beat USA, Australia and Japan

 

SUIYHP

The King's Gull

Apr 16, 2009

1,899

Inside Southwick Tunnel

• Feb 8, 2017

• #12

turienzo's lovechild said:

England went for 2018. Qatar beat USA, Australia and Japan

Click to expand...

I remember, I'm still bitter about Russia getting it. But the nature of the corruption scandal taking place at FIFA only makes me consider how fair the bidding process actually was. It's too late now but personally would have liked the plug pulled before billions was sunk into it already, and likewise the host nation should've been a country that had a (reasonably) successful record of sustaining major international competitions.

Though I will accept with the current issues of the FA and demand for reform, as well as the sorry state of English football on the international stage, maybe it was for the better.

 

drew

Drew

Oct 3, 2006

23,063

Burgess Hill

• Feb 8, 2017

• #13

TomandJerry said:

Qatar is spending almost $500m (£400m) a week on major infrastructure projects as it prepares for the 2022 Fifa World Cup, its finance minister has said.

Ali al-Emadi expected spending to continue at that level for three to four years as new stadiums, motorways, rail links and hospitals are built.

More than $200bn (£160bn) will be spent in total by the gas-rich emirate.

But Mr Emadi denied that the plans would make the 2022 tournament the most expensive World Cup yet.

The 2014 World Cup in Brazil is reported to have cost $11bn (£8.8bn) to host, while Russia increased government spending on the 2018 World Cup by $321m to $10.7bn.

Click to expand...

He should get Sean Spicer to do a press release to support that statement!!

 

Mellotron

I've asked for soup

Jul 2, 2008

31,845

Brighton

• Feb 8, 2017

• #14

Wonder how much has gone into the pockets of Beckenbauer et al, to keep the worker deaths hushed up. *****. Actual ***** with blood on their hands.

 

lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969

Jun 11, 2011

13,723

Worthing

• Feb 8, 2017

• #15

What with FIFA corruption, the multitude of deaths of the labour force, increasing the number of teams in the finals to 48, I hope FIFA end up with just the tournament they so richly deserve

 

Dr. Notthenineo'clocknews

Remainer

Mar 19, 2007

7,060

The Graveyard & The Ballroom

• Feb 9, 2017

• #16

I stand to be corrected but during the world cups of the 60s and the 70s wasn't it a case of build a new stadium for the final (if necc.) give a lick of paint to the existing ones, flush all the bogs the night before and put on a few extra buses on match day.

With the exception of a new stadium I could bring the World Cup in for about £100k

 

ditchy

a man with a sound track record as a source of qua

Jul 8, 2003

5,209

brighton

• Feb 9, 2017

• #17

turienzo's lovechild said:

England went for 2018. Qatar beat USA, Australia and Japan

Click to expand...

No ... Blatter beat USA Australia and Japan

 

nicko31

Well-known member

Jan 7, 2010

17,587

Gods country fortnightly

• Feb 9, 2017

• #18

turienzo's lovechild said:

England went for 2018. Qatar beat USA, Australia and Japan

Click to expand...

A WC in Oz would have been great

Must admit close to zero interest the WC these days, the toxic combination of FIFA and England's cycle of failure. Wake me up in 2026

 

Giraffe

VERY part time moderator

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Aug 8, 2005

26,548

• Feb 9, 2017

• #19

2018 should have been England not Russia
2022 should have been Australia not Qatar

Simple.

 

El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton

Helpful Moderator

Jul 5, 2003

39,709

Pattknull med Haksprut

• Feb 9, 2017

• #20

TomandJerry said:

Qatar is spending almost $500m (£400m) a week on major infrastructure projects as it prepares for the 2022 Fifa World Cup, its finance minister has said.

Ali al-Emadi expected spending to continue at that level for three to four years as new stadiums, motorways, rail links and hospitals are built.

More than $200bn (£160bn) will be spent in total by the gas-rich emirate.

But Mr Emadi denied that the plans would make the 2022 tournament the most expensive World Cup yet.

The 2014 World Cup in Brazil is reported to have cost $11bn (£8.8bn) to host, while Russia increased government spending on the 2018 World Cup by $321m to $10.7bn.

Click to expand...

Given how much the Qatari FA is paying football finance DULLARDS to help them understand how to calculate the numbers on the tournament I am not surprised at those figures.