Callum Wilson/Muzza

put_that_board_down

Member

Apr 29, 2012

32

• Feb 2, 2017

• #1

I see Callum Wilson is badly injured again at Bournemouth, not sure when this happened but wonder if they might have recalled Muzza for backup if we hadn't signed him permanently in the Window..............good timing?

 

B

bhanutz

Well-known member

Aug 23, 2005

5,998

• Feb 2, 2017

• #2

They couldn't have recalled him...

 

lizard

Well-hung member

Jul 14, 2005

3,332

• Feb 2, 2017

• #3

I don't think the terms of the loan allowed for a recall anyway.

 

Mattywerewolf

Well-known member

Mar 7, 2012

894

Saff of the River

• Feb 2, 2017

• #4

yeah but might have changed the price

 

S

Soulman

New member

Oct 22, 2012

10,966

Sompting

• Feb 2, 2017

• #5

No total recall.

 

spence

British and Proud

Oct 15, 2014

9,814

Crawley

• Feb 2, 2017

• #6

Mattywerewolf said:

yeah but might have changed the price

Click to expand...

Why might it have changed the price ?

 

Triggaaar

Well-known member

Oct 24, 2005

50,171

Goldstone

• Feb 2, 2017

• #7

put_that_board_down said:

wonder if they might have recalled Muzza for backup if we hadn't signed him permanently

Click to expand...

They couldn't. You wanna come out of the cupboard a bit more.

 

S

Shropshire Seagull

Well-known member

Nov 5, 2004

8,496

Telford

• Feb 2, 2017

• #8

Year loan is non returnable - I think ...

 

M

Machiavelli

Well-known member

Oct 11, 2013

16,647

Fiveways

• Feb 2, 2017

• #9

I do feel for Wilson. Good player, but has suffered badly with ACL injuries.

 

P

portslade seagull

Well-known member

Jul 19, 2003

17,606

portslade

• Feb 2, 2017

• #10

Only injured yesterday I believe. As others have said no recall agreement in his loan deal

 

Mattywerewolf

Well-known member

Mar 7, 2012

894

Saff of the River

• Feb 2, 2017

• #11

spence said:

Why might it have changed the price ?

Click to expand...

Well, if he turns out to be injured for a long time, or doesn't rehab well, then in the summer they would recall Murray rather than sell him at current price. Gives them another option which has a value. so i reckon they would have held back from the sale or upped the price

 

Lurchy

Well-known member

Jul 2, 2014

2,350

• Feb 2, 2017

• #12

put_that_board_down said:

I see Callum Wilson is badly injured again at Bournemouth, not sure when this happened but wonder if they might have recalled Muzza for backup if we hadn't signed him permanently in the Window..............good timing?

Click to expand...

Wouldn't have been able to recall Murray unless all three parties agreed to terminate loan early. If they did feel they were short of strikers, only thing they could have done would have been to stop Grabban from leaving.

 

put_that_board_down

Member

Apr 29, 2012

32

• Feb 2, 2017

• Thread starter
• #13

Triggaaar said:

They couldn't. You wanna come out of the cupboard a bit more.

Click to expand...

Forgot what the terms of his loan were, and with Walton recalled from his..........................

 

Triggaaar

Well-known member

Oct 24, 2005

50,171

Goldstone

• Feb 2, 2017

• #14

put_that_board_down said:

Forgot what the terms of his loan were, and with Walton recalled from his..........................

Click to expand...

Yeah I wouldn't have had a clue, but it was discussed a lot on here.