Clive Walker
Stand Or Fall
Is it a 3 game ban or not?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Murray red (and appeal)
- Thread starter Clive Walker
- Start date
One
darkwolf666
Well-known member
McTavish
Well-known member
- Nov 5, 2014
- 1,562
Where's Dr No?
GingerBeerMan
3-0
- Dec 29, 2011
- 8,024
It's one for a straight red unless it's dangerous or reckless. Never two unless they've already had a ban.
Before anyone argues, it was a red. It's quicker to duck than raise your hands and therefore he could have avoided being hit in the face if he wanted to duck.
Before anyone argues, it was a red. It's quicker to duck than raise your hands and therefore he could have avoided being hit in the face if he wanted to duck.
Someone posted a hlighylighs thread. It's on there.
GingerBeerMan
3-0
- Dec 29, 2011
- 8,024
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,254
One. Spot on from the ref to send him off. I suppose it worked out as that was struck well and going towards the top corner.
D
Deleted member 2719
Guest
One if he had wanted a three match he could have right hooked Hutchinson.
Clive Walker
Stand Or Fall
- Thread starter
- #13
So it's either1 ,2 or 3?
pb21
Well-known member
- Apr 23, 2010
- 6,290
Hmm, deliberate hand ball. Thought at the time it was ball to hand. Suspect it was the correct decision, but can't blame Murray really.
darkwolf666
Well-known member
The ironic thing was Hutchinson was the first Wednesday player in the refs face demanding a red card - didn't end well for him, did it!
clippedgull
Hotdogs, extra onions
It was the right decision! Instinctive hands from Murray.
Ref got it wrong on their second red. Should have been a straight red not second yellow.
StonehamPark
#Brighton-Nil
Definite red, rightly called by the ref.
I'd probably say the opposite hadn't Stocko saved the penalty.
I'd probably say the opposite hadn't Stocko saved the penalty.
worthingseagull
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 1,447
clearly straight red, cant believe anyone who's seen it on tv would suggest otherwise.
lhughes
Member
Very much a game of opinions and shows why video replays for certain things may not work.
Personally, I feel that if you're defending your face from the ball (as soft as the person is being!), it shouldn't be red as the ball would have hit the person anyway. A yellow would have been sufficient in my eyes.
Thought it could have been a blessing in disguise as it may have prompted us to bring in a striker by showing us how one striker can easily miss games, but with it being only a single game suspension...?
Personally, I feel that if you're defending your face from the ball (as soft as the person is being!), it shouldn't be red as the ball would have hit the person anyway. A yellow would have been sufficient in my eyes.
Thought it could have been a blessing in disguise as it may have prompted us to bring in a striker by showing us how one striker can easily miss games, but with it being only a single game suspension...?