Keith Patel
**** off Lino.
Interesting to see that everyone seems to have passed FFP for last season, including the promoted teams. Forest are the only club facing an embargo purely down to the fact they haven't bothered to submit their accounts!
http://www.efl.com/news/article/2016/efl-financial-fair-play-sky-bet-championship-3492432.aspx
I was sure Derby were over spending, their wage bill must be massive. Anyone surprised?
http://www.efl.com/news/article/2016/efl-financial-fair-play-sky-bet-championship-3492432.aspx
An initial review of the 2015/16 Sky Bet Championship FFP submissions indicates that all clubs met the ‘Fair Play Requirement’ introduced under the competition rules in 2012.
It would mean for the first time since the FFP regulations were agreed by all league clubs that no team from the Championship (who provided a submission) will exceed the maximum permitted deviation, which was set last season at £13m (£5m loss plus £8m shareholder investment). Failure to meet the deviation limits has previously resulted in clubs facing financial sanctions or an FFP embargo.
Promoted clubs Burnley, Middlesbrough and Hull City all stayed within the fair play regulations whilst two of the sides relegated to Sky Bet League One – MK Dons and Charlton Athletic – also met the requirement.
However, Bolton Wanderers - also relegated to League One – have not submitted a 2015/16 FFP return or audited accounts and as a result will remain under FFP embargo.
One other Championship club (Nottingham Forest) is still to submit a copy of its audited accounts and failure to do so will result in an FFP embargo from January 1, 2017. However, their FFP return does suggest that they would meet the Fair Play requirement. Once the audited accounts are submitted any FFP embargo would be lifted.
I was sure Derby were over spending, their wage bill must be massive. Anyone surprised?