Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Murray and Baldock
- Thread starter Mellotron
- Start date
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
Until that DULLARD took off Baldock and made us DEFEND and we ended up LOOSING a point
Prince Monolulu
Everything in Moderation
The boys up top looked good, it's BURNO at the back we need to keep an eye on.
Poyningsgull
Well-known member
- Apr 12, 2007
- 1,625
If they could all play like him we we would have got promoted 4 years ago.!
Murray and Baldock
2 uncompromising, heavy drinking, divorced cops who will stop at nothing to get their man. No rule they won't break, they all ways work two cases and when the Super questions them they're not afraid to go it alone without their badge and gun. Even if it means venturing onto the Jasmin Allen estate alone at night.
Coming to ITV soon
2 uncompromising, heavy drinking, divorced cops who will stop at nothing to get their man. No rule they won't break, they all ways work two cases and when the Super questions them they're not afraid to go it alone without their badge and gun. Even if it means venturing onto the Jasmin Allen estate alone at night.
Coming to ITV soon
4, if you count the one wrongly flagged offside at Hillsborough.
Just serves as a reminder of the opportunity missed.
But hey ho enough about that, onwards and upwards.
But hey ho enough about that, onwards and upwards.
If all players are fit and on form I think the best front four is
Lualua, Baldock, Murray, Knockaert
The midfield two
Kayal, Stephens
Back four
Bruno Duffy Dunk Bong
But not for all games. An extra midfielder could replace a winger/forward. Rosenior or Norwood would be my first choices.
Against sides with tricky quick forwards I might prefer Goldson to Duffy.
Agreed?
When we are holding on to a 1-0 lead, I can't think who is best to bring on though? Or who to take of. Not an extra defender/midfielder as I think we need to keep possession. I would tend to take a leaf out of Leicester's book and put on our best forward at keeping possession and pump the ball into the corner/out wide. Not sure who is our best player at keeping the ball (except Knockaert). They all seem about the same otherwise. Stats don't give a clue. Bearing that in mind, I'm inclined to take off any player that appears to be tiring. Or not make any substitutes at all as it takes time for the new entrant to get up to pace.
Stats say for this season Norwood is safest at keeping the ball and Murray is the worst at losing it. So Norwood for Murray makes stats sense.
Lualua, Baldock, Murray, Knockaert
The midfield two
Kayal, Stephens
Back four
Bruno Duffy Dunk Bong
But not for all games. An extra midfielder could replace a winger/forward. Rosenior or Norwood would be my first choices.
Against sides with tricky quick forwards I might prefer Goldson to Duffy.
Agreed?
When we are holding on to a 1-0 lead, I can't think who is best to bring on though? Or who to take of. Not an extra defender/midfielder as I think we need to keep possession. I would tend to take a leaf out of Leicester's book and put on our best forward at keeping possession and pump the ball into the corner/out wide. Not sure who is our best player at keeping the ball (except Knockaert). They all seem about the same otherwise. Stats don't give a clue. Bearing that in mind, I'm inclined to take off any player that appears to be tiring. Or not make any substitutes at all as it takes time for the new entrant to get up to pace.
Stats say for this season Norwood is safest at keeping the ball and Murray is the worst at losing it. So Norwood for Murray makes stats sense.
Last edited:
Murray 17
Well-known member
- Jul 6, 2003
- 2,159
Lost 2 points, didn't we?
Murray 17
Well-known member
- Jul 6, 2003
- 2,159
Agreed, except Lualua. Would probably have Skalak, just ahead of Murphy, unless of course Solly returns to full fitness.
Whoops, I forgot about Solly March. He could replace either Baldock or Lualua if he gets up to speed. All the times he is getting on top form he has got injured so I have just not seen enough of him.
BensGrandad
New member
We do not play with 4 forwards so that thankfully is good bye to Lua Lua and replace him with a midfielder like March/Skalak?Murphy and leave LL to the U23s where he can excel or the occasional 10 mins from the bench.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,287
Shame Hemed wasn't fit - would have been perfect to have him replace Muzza on the hour mark when Glenn was clearly ****ed! Hemed has also been decent all season IMO - the 3 strikers have all been excellent so far..!
- Thread starter
- #17
I've got nothing against Tomer, works very hard, I'm just not convinced by him and Murray together. But yes he would be ideal for a tiring Murray.
fat old seagull
New member
On Saturday........YES! not for the first time.
What we do when we're goal up with 30 mins left is to (try and) shut up shop. We then become like a boxer with no arms, and take a slapping. At least put some quick legs (maybe Elvis) in the centre circle at all times, for a quick break...at least it keeps your opponents honest.
Machiavelli
Well-known member
Baldock was just brilliant today.
Good thread: they're working brilliantly together.