Murray's Disallowed Goal

Sheebo

Well-known member

Jul 13, 2003

29,287

• Oct 2, 2016

• #1

Yes, I know it fortunately doesn't matter but he was 100% WELL onside - and I mean well onside. You can pause the replay from the TV and their left back is well behind play - probably 12 yards out and Muzza runs from about the edge of the box after the pass is played. That is an absolute shocker from the lino and took away what was a superb finish...

Not seen it mentioned on here and isn't in the Sky highlights that's all

 

Triggaaar

Well-known member

Oct 24, 2005

50,171

Goldstone

• Oct 2, 2016

• #2

sheebo said:

Yes, I know it fortunately doesn't matter

Click to expand...

Unless we fail to get promoted on GD again.

 

Sheebo

Well-known member

Jul 13, 2003

29,287

• Oct 2, 2016

• Thread starter
• #3

Triggaaar said:

Unless we fail to get promoted on GD again.

Click to expand...

Goals change completion of games - we may have lost if it had been given... Devils advocate

 

Jimmy Grimble

Well-known member

Nov 10, 2007

9,746

Starting a revolution from my bed

• Oct 2, 2016

• #4

Check the highlights thread mate, I've mentioned it and posted pictures which shows he was onside.

 

Gazwag

5 millionth post poster

Mar 4, 2004

30,137

Bexhill-on-Sea

• Oct 2, 2016

• #5

It's extraordinary how the quality of refs and assistant refs is reducing year by year. There is so little consistency as well.

 

Jimmy Grimble

Well-known member

Nov 10, 2007

9,746

Starting a revolution from my bed

• Oct 2, 2016

• #6

Here they are again if anyone's missed it:

View attachment 78370View attachment 78371

 

Sheebo

Well-known member

Jul 13, 2003

29,287

• Oct 2, 2016

• Thread starter
• #7

Jimmy Grimble said:

Check the highlights thread mate, I've mentioned it and posted pictures which shows he was onside.

Click to expand...

Ah sorry bro I didn't realise Glad you're on the ball though - it was a ****ing mile onside and their left back was right in front of Lino - hideous decision for a 'top' official to make!

 

Triggaaar

Well-known member

Oct 24, 2005

50,171

Goldstone

• Oct 2, 2016

• #8

Jimmy Grimble said:

Check the highlights thread mate, I've mentioned it and posted pictures which shows he was onside.

Click to expand...

Your pictures don't actually show it, as they're taken a while apart, and you can't see if Murray has come to an onside position from an offside position.

Obviously I realise that won't have happened, given this thread, but it's not in the pictures you posted.

No offence meant

 

Sheebo

Well-known member

Jul 13, 2003

29,287

• Oct 2, 2016

• Thread starter
• #9

Jimmy Grimble said:

Here they are again if anyone's missed it:

View attachment 78370View attachment 78371

Click to expand...

Yep - second frame is well after he's kicked it too - you can tell that by where the players are looking and the fact the Weds player is 2 yards further upfield. I'd say he's 5 yards onside when that was kicked at least - especially as he'd have come from further back and was moving forward towards the goal too!

 

Jimmy Grimble

Well-known member

Nov 10, 2007

9,746

Starting a revolution from my bed

• Oct 2, 2016

• #10

Triggaaar said:

Your pictures don't actually show it, as they're taken a while apart, and you can't see if Murray has come to an onside position from an offside position.

Obviously I realise that won't have happened, given this thread, but it's not in the pictures you posted.

No offence meant

Click to expand...

I'd say about a second isn't quite a 'while apart'[emoji2]

 

Sheebo

Well-known member

Jul 13, 2003

29,287

• Oct 2, 2016

• Thread starter
• #11

Jimmy Grimble said:

I'd say about a second isn't quite a 'while apart'[emoji2]

Click to expand...

Prob less than a second - you can tell from normal time he's running onto it so your pics prob don't show just how bad a decision it was if anything!

 

Jimmy Grimble

Well-known member

Nov 10, 2007

9,746

Starting a revolution from my bed

• Oct 2, 2016

• #12

sheebo said:

Prob less than a second - you can tell from normal time he's running onto it so your pics prob don't show just how bad a decision it was if anything!

Click to expand...

Exactly. Possibly 2 yards onside and the defender who's playing him on is about 5 yards away from the lino[emoji44]

 

Captain Sensible

Well-known member

Jul 8, 2003

6,435

Not the real one

• Oct 2, 2016

• #13

Hughton said after the match that they thought it was onside. So you know if Hughton says it....it's true!
Watched the video a couple of times, he's behind being level so Murray and the Albion were done by a dud linesman.

 

Langley

New member

Mar 10, 2008

781

Waltham Chase, Hants

• Oct 2, 2016

• #14

Jimmy Grimble said:

I'd say about a second isn't quite a 'while apart'[emoji2]

Click to expand...

100 metres in 10 seconds, equates to 10 metres in one second.
If Murray even ran the 100 metres in20 seconds, he would still have been 5 metres onside.

 

El Turi

Injured

Aug 13, 2005

6,928

Argentina

• Oct 2, 2016

• #15

A real shame as it was a quality finish.

 

K

knocky1

Well-known member

Jan 20, 2010

12,965

• Oct 2, 2016

• #16

Langley said:

100 metres in 10 seconds, equates to 10 metres in one second.
If Murray even ran the 100 metres in20 seconds, he would still have been 5 metres onside.

Click to expand...

http://speedendurance.com/2013/04/09/fastest-10-meter-splits/
Not being serious just a smart Arse here but the world record for the first 10m interval of a 100m from a standing start is 1.86 seconds. The speed builds up through the run. Changing direction and Murray's age and being a non elite sprinter would as you say also need to be taken into account.

Brilliant goal though!