Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Player ratings vs Preston?
- Thread starter goldstone
- Start date
Stockdale 7: The only thing he had to do was make one save in the second half, but it earned us a point. Distribution, especially kicking, was good.
Bruno 6: A bit sloppy compared to much of what we have seen this season from our favourite hipster. Sometimes out of position when PNE attacked.
Dunk 6: Won a lot in the air. Some good blocks, but some silly kicking out at a PNE player and then arguing with the ref that could have earned a yellow or a red.
Goldson 6: Solid, dependable, looking more and more like an inspired signing, and with Dunk a potential long term CH partnership for this division.
Rosenior 8: Makes a huge difference, very keen to get up the pitch, interchanges well with Murphy, knows how to defend.
Kayal 7: Tigerish as always, always wants to be involved
Stephens 7: Tidy, understated, some good link play and put a foot in when needed.
Knockaert 6: Struggled to make much impact, but did wind up the opposition fans.
Murphy 7: A very Murphy like display, switched wings when necessary, prepared to take on defenders, unlucky with the disallowed goal which was our best (realistically only) piece of creative play all match.
Hemed 6: Won little in the air, looked far better with ball to feet.
Baldock 5: Lots of running and closing down, but posed no threat to PNE.
Subs
Skalak 6: Busy, enthusiastic, but tended to run into blind alleys
Wilson 6: A bit more than we've seen from him recently, something still doesn't seem wholly right to me though.
Zamora n/a: No time to get involved.
Bruno 6: A bit sloppy compared to much of what we have seen this season from our favourite hipster. Sometimes out of position when PNE attacked.
Dunk 6: Won a lot in the air. Some good blocks, but some silly kicking out at a PNE player and then arguing with the ref that could have earned a yellow or a red.
Goldson 6: Solid, dependable, looking more and more like an inspired signing, and with Dunk a potential long term CH partnership for this division.
Rosenior 8: Makes a huge difference, very keen to get up the pitch, interchanges well with Murphy, knows how to defend.
Kayal 7: Tigerish as always, always wants to be involved
Stephens 7: Tidy, understated, some good link play and put a foot in when needed.
Knockaert 6: Struggled to make much impact, but did wind up the opposition fans.
Murphy 7: A very Murphy like display, switched wings when necessary, prepared to take on defenders, unlucky with the disallowed goal which was our best (realistically only) piece of creative play all match.
Hemed 6: Won little in the air, looked far better with ball to feet.
Baldock 5: Lots of running and closing down, but posed no threat to PNE.
Subs
Skalak 6: Busy, enthusiastic, but tended to run into blind alleys
Wilson 6: A bit more than we've seen from him recently, something still doesn't seem wholly right to me though.
Zamora n/a: No time to get involved.
lawros left foot
Glory hunting since 1969
Bobby didn't get on El Pres, it was Sidwell
Easy mistake to make tho
Easy mistake to make tho
Bobby didn't get on El Pres, it was Sidwell
Easy mistake to make tho
Good point, explains why Bobby didn't get involved though.........
One hot tub one ambition
Active member
Pretty much everyone in the away end thought Zamora was coming in when in actual fact it was sidwell.
Aspinall also called it that Zamora was coming on, and then changed it.