[News] Government tax credit cuts bill defeated in the House of Lords

Bozza · Oct 26, 2015

1. The motion peers have passed instructs the government to delay the tax credit cuts (which are due to come into force in April) until it has taken account of an independent analysis of who is going to lose out. Vote was 307 - 277.

2. Another defeat for the government - Labour's motion, under the name of Baroness Hollis, has been passed by 289 to 272. It calls for the changes to be delayed until a three-year package of transitional financial help for those affected has been agreed upon.

Bevendean Hillbilly · Oct 26, 2015

I'm no fan of the unelected house but, on this occasion, hooray for the Lords.

beorhthelm · Oct 26, 2015

well thats going to be a bit of a pickle.

Red Side Of Sussex · Oct 26, 2015

Good.

Hampster Gull · Oct 26, 2015

Crusties

Taybha · Oct 26, 2015

Cant imagine how the clown thought it a good idea in the 1st place , mind boggling .

Dorset Seagull · Oct 26, 2015

Oh the irony

Hugo Rune · Oct 26, 2015

Bevendean Hillbilly said:
I'm no fan of the unelected house but, on this occasion, hooray for the Lords.

I'm no fan of the nasty party but, on this occasion, they will have my 100% support if they use this circumstance to abolish the unelected house replacing it with elected lords nominated by voters. However they won't as they are are the party of the privileged and powerful and will look after the institutions. This situation has made me chuckle.

Ernest · Oct 26, 2015

Osborne has kissed goodbye to ever becoming leader, how the Tories thought this would get through without protest is mind boggling. Shows you how out of touch they are and nice to see them come crashing down to earth with a bump.

Hampster Gull · Oct 26, 2015

Nothing that a few revisions wont sort. That is what the second chamber is for, to shape policy

Butch Willykins · Oct 26, 2015

Here's a compromise. Pay working tax credit as vouchers rather than cash.

I'm still not convinced these payments go much further than funding a Sky TV subscription in an awful lot of cases.

5ways · Oct 26, 2015

I'm no Tory but this is an outrageous infringement on the primacy of the Commons. That unelected Peers - Bishops and Earls among them - have done this is entirely unacceptable and undemocratic.

Leekbrookgull · Oct 26, 2015

Taybha said:
Cant imagine how the clown thought it a good idea in the 1st place , mind boggling .

Gormless Gordon.

Stat Brother · Oct 26, 2015

Turns out he didn't lie after all:-

A fuller section here:-

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/question-time-election-leaders-david-5612459

Raleigh Chopper · Oct 26, 2015

5ways said:
I'm no Tory but this is an outrageous infringement on the primacy of the Commons. That unelected Peers - Bishops and Earls among them - have done this is entirely unacceptable and undemocratic.

Not on this occasion, thank god for the House Of Lords, To lie time and time again and then go back on his word after the election and make the poorest even poorer is disgusting, it had to be stopped, although I do, in principal agree with you. Sometimes the Government just goes too far.

jamie the seagull · Oct 26, 2015

Mustafa said:

They have forgotten to add people like us who have to work to fund those who stop working when the 16 hour limit is reached.
If they cannot cut the amount they pay these types for 3 years then lets make sure we delay the other changes proposed to assist such as the increase in working wage for same period.

jackanada · Oct 26, 2015

jamie the seagull said:
They have forgotten to add people like us who have to work to fund those who stop working when the 16 hour limit is reached.
If they cannot cut the amount they pay these types for 3 years then lets make sure we delay the other changes proposed to assist such as the increase in working wage for same period.

These types? The media focus on an unsavory minority of the poor does not excuse your hideous attitude.

jamie the seagull · Oct 26, 2015

jackanada said:
These types? The media focus on an unsavory minority of the poor does not excuse your hideous attitude.

I work with enough of the majority who refuse to do more than 16 hours because the would lose the tax credits...
They do the minimum number of hours to gain the most credits...
I had nothing and got where I am through hard work and drive..everything that these people will never have whilst others supplement their laziness.

BUTTERBALL · Oct 26, 2015

The Lords should not be able to overrule the elected parliament.

However, this disgusting raid on the pockets of the working poorest needed to be halted until a more credible alternative is found, so in this case needs must.

beorhthelm · Oct 26, 2015

Taybha said:
Cant imagine how the clown thought it a good idea in the 1st place , mind boggling .

there's £35bn reasons why something needs to be done about tax credits. and what both motions do, as well as sensible opposition to them, is reduce or delay the impact of them, not stop them completely.

the fact the Lords is overrulling the elected government's programme is an interesting precedent for them to set, especially on finance the one area considered wholey the preserve of the commons. kings have been beheaded for this.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Government tax credit cuts bill defeated in the House of Lords

You can change this

New member

A. Virgo, Football Genius

Active member

New member

Whalewhine

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull

Well-known member

Stupid IDIOT

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

East Stand Brighton Boyz

A. Virgo, Football Genius

Share this page