Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Hydrogen Power







Mutts Nuts

New member
Oct 30, 2011
4,918
Hydrogen fuel cells have no real future - it's an extremely inefficient way of drawing energy. Remember that hydrogen is not a source of energy, it's just a storage mechanism - so the process of splitting water using energy (electrolysis) and dumping the oxygen, then pressurising it and drawing energy from it is extremely inefficient.

Ironically, the most cost effective way to make hydrogen fuel cells is from hydrocarbons, aka oil, which is probably why it's popular within the oil industry...

The future is electric - battery technology is about to boom, it's a matter of years before electric car batteries have the recharging time, longevity and affordability to make it fit for every day use - so let's not waste our time and money on hydrogen.

New trials have it being produced using the power from wind turbines cannot get much more eco friendly than that, no fossil fuels required at all
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,300
its covered by the article, its the lack of infrastructure. also the technology requires some fairly complex industrial components they dont seem to be able to produce in a cost efficent process, though that may change.

infrastructure also holds back batteries too, as you need substantial supply to charge up batteries on any scale. what we are most likly to see is some form of hydrogen fuel cell at home or in local distribution points, which can charge battery driven vehicles. hydrogen has a stonking energy density compared to other sources of energy, so it should be the way forward.
 


Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
19,844
Playing snooker
Just me that thought this was a new player? :rant:
 


Mutts Nuts

New member
Oct 30, 2011
4,918
its covered by the article, its the lack of infrastructure. also the technology requires some fairly complex industrial components they dont seem to be able to produce in a cost efficent process, though that may change.

infrastructure also holds back batteries too, as you need substantial supply to charge up batteries on any scale. what we are most likly to see is some form of hydrogen fuel cell at home or in local distribution points, which can charge battery driven vehicles. hydrogen has a stonking energy density compared to other sources of energy, so it should be the way forward.

By the same token the power generated by wind turbines is not being fully utilized as the infrastructure is not fully in place to store the power they generate, for that reason they are turned off regularly while we continue to use electricity generated at nuclear power stations.
 




Igzilla

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2012
1,644
Worthing
its covered by the article, its the lack of infrastructure. also the technology requires some fairly complex industrial components they dont seem to be able to produce in a cost efficent process, though that may change.

infrastructure also holds back batteries too, as you need substantial supply to charge up batteries on any scale. what we are most likly to see is some form of hydrogen fuel cell at home or in local distribution points, which can charge battery driven vehicles. hydrogen has a stonking energy density compared to other sources of energy, so it should be the way forward.

It's also the most abundant element in the Universe, so no chance of running out.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,300
By the same token the power generated by wind turbines is not being fully utilized as the infrastructure is not fully in place to store the power they generate, for that reason they are turned off regularly while we continue to use electricity generated at nuclear power stations.

wind power is, on balance, one of the worst alternative sources of power as it is so irregular and fraught with problems (like in high wind stop them to avoid overburdening the generator; long term maintenance costs). but it would be would be very good idea if they were used to create hydrogen for easy storage. what we really need is a few more nuclear power stations to make wind power redundant. or biofuel. or anything, im convinced wind power has only taken off as its simple technology, so has been a quick and easy (and visible) fix.
 


Seagull27

Well-known member
Feb 7, 2011
3,308
Bristol
Hydrogen fuel cells have no real future - it's an extremely inefficient way of drawing energy. Remember that hydrogen is not a source of energy, it's just a storage mechanism - so the process of splitting water using energy (electrolysis) and dumping the oxygen, then pressurising it and drawing energy from it is extremely inefficient.

Ironically, the most cost effective way to make hydrogen fuel cells is from hydrocarbons, aka oil, which is probably why it's popular within the oil industry...

The future is electric - battery technology is about to boom, it's a matter of years before electric car batteries have the recharging time, longevity and affordability to make it fit for every day use - so let's not waste our time and money on hydrogen.
The problem with batteries is that they often use rare and expensive metals that are difficult to dispose of. You're right that water splitting is currently inefficient, but with enough research into catalysts to lower the energy required to do this, coupled with the most effective power generation mechanism, it could still be very useful for energy storage. The only by-product for burning hydrogen is water, which is obviously very environmentally friendly.

I believe one of the biggest obstacles currently is how to safely store the hydrogen itself, as storing big tanks of H2 isn't generally advisable.
 




Mutts Nuts

New member
Oct 30, 2011
4,918
The problem with batteries is that they often use rare and expensive metals that are difficult to dispose of. You're right that water splitting is currently inefficient, but with enough research into catalysts to lower the energy required to do this, coupled with the most effective power generation mechanism, it could still be very useful for energy storage. The only by-product for burning hydrogen is water, which is obviously very environmentally friendly.

I believe one of the biggest obstacles currently is how to safely store the hydrogen itself, as storing big tanks of H2 isn't generally advisable.

Storage is probably an issue as you state, but I believe the biggest obstacle is lack of finance for it`s development
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here