Honky Tonx
New member
If we are going to play with two wide men why don't the club sign a tall centre forward?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Two wingers but not enough height up front.
- Thread starter Honky Tonx
- Start date
Count Otto Black
New member
- Jul 22, 2015
- 134
bobby zamora
GoingUp
Well-known member
The pitch looked quite small today, we struggled on the wings at time, said to my mate there is no way we are going to out muscle Fulham on crosses. But yeah we could do with some more hight and physicality for sure.
StonehamPark
#Brighton-Nil
Mackenzie
Old Brightonian
We have two.
Codner pharmaceuticals
Well-known member
Are crosses only allowed for tall fellas? Someone better tell Bruno and Baldock tonight
GoingUp
Well-known member
Being 6ft doesnt mean your an aerial threat. COG isnt really a threat in the air. But Fulham's Smith for example, I dont think he is over 6'1 but was pain all game. I agree with the thread starter we could do with some who is an aerial threat and has knack for getting on the end of crosses.
Mackenzie
Old Brightonian
Matt Smith is 6'6".
We're the Stripes
Well-known member
Matt Smith is 6ft 6in according to Wikipedia!
brightn'ove
cringe
Mackenzie
Old Brightonian
This is a great thread btw.
Hyperion
New member
- Nov 1, 2010
- 5,314
Funny you should say that
symyjym
Banned
Matt Smith played Dr Who as well according to Wikipedia
HantsSeagull
Well-known member
Something you wanna tell us?!
FYI it's 2015.
GoingUp
Well-known member
Damn didn't realises he was that tall, he looked more of a lump then tall yesterday. But my point was that being over 6ft doesn't mean their good in the air, like someone mentioned above Tim Cahill is/was great in the air. I just agreed with the thread starter we need some players that are able to score us some headed goals and be a nuisances in the air.