Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Freedom of Information Act



Dick Swiveller

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2011
9,142
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...ld-be-watered-down-as-review-is-launched.html

With a review likely to water down the act, what are people's views? Whilst it has helped uncover a lot of wrong doing that would likely have otherwise remained hidden, it does seem to be massively abused - persistent trouble makers and journalists most to blame. Among all of the genuine requests are a lot of frivolous requests that tie up a lot of resources on what are essentially fishing trips. For example, I had to drop everything for an hour to urgently respond to a BBC request for figures that bore no relation to the small piece they were doing on the local part of Sunday politics and were never used. A non story presumably resulted in a scattershot of FOI requests all over the South East despite the focus being in Medway.

Anyone else had experience of frivolous requests and will it be the death of genuine requests?
 


Igzilla

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2012
1,641
Worthing
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...ld-be-watered-down-as-review-is-launched.html

With a review likely to water down the act, what are people's views? Whilst it has helped uncover a lot of wrong doing that would likely have otherwise remained hidden, it does seem to be massively abused - persistent trouble makers and journalists most to blame. Among all of the genuine requests are a lot of frivolous requests that tie up a lot of resources on what are essentially fishing trips. For example, I had to drop everything for an hour to urgently respond to a BBC request for figures that bore no relation to the small piece they were doing on the local part of Sunday politics and were never used. A non story presumably resulted in a scattershot of FOI requests all over the South East despite the focus being in Medway.

Anyone else had experience of frivolous requests and will it be the death of genuine requests?

I haven't had any personal experience with requests, but my own view is that a bit of inconvenience is probably on balance worth it in order to highlight abuses of power, corruption, illegality etc etc.
 


edna krabappel

Well-known member
NSC Patreon
Jul 7, 2003
47,228
Good lord: if they remove this power, the Argus will surely fold. I can't imagine how they will fill their pages without having the chance to bombard public bodies with stupid requests about how many packets of biscuits they order annually.
 


seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
43,690
Crap Town
Good lord: if they remove this power, the Argus will surely fold. I can't imagine how they will fill their pages without having the chance to bombard public bodies with stupid requests about how many packets of biscuits they order annually.

Will they have to specify the types of biscuit too as some public bodies don't classify a jaffa cake as being a biscuit ?
 


edna krabappel

Well-known member
NSC Patreon
Jul 7, 2003
47,228
Will they have to specify the types of biscuit too as some public bodies don't classify a jaffa cake as being a biscuit ?

Good point. I hope the Argus asked that pertinent question. It's a highly important VAT issue that the public deserve to know about.
 






In his memoirs Tony Blair describes the Freedom of Information act as a mistake. probably well intentioned, like the dangerous dogs act and the gun control measures after Dunblane, but it hasn't done what it was designed to do. No wonder the journalists are up in arms there are plans to amend it, God's gift to lazy journalism.
 


In his memoirs Tony Blair describes the Freedom of Information act as a mistake. probably well intentioned, like the dangerous dogs act and the gun control measures after Dunblane, but it hasn't done what it was designed to do. No wonder the journalists are up in arms there are plans to amend it, God's gift to lazy journalism.

Before anybody posts that of course Tony Blair wouldn't like anything which might help get to the truth, that's not my point.

My point is that as far as I can see the FoA has not helped uncover loads of scandals. But scandals have still been uncovered by both good investigative journalism and leaks.

But what the FoA has done is to tie up loads of people in unnecessary demands for information.

I don't think it should be abolished but it does need amending.
 




When I worked in local government, the local media used to employ quality local journalists who knew how to investigate what was going on. The journos have long since disappeared, to be replaced by kids just out of college who imagine that all you need to dig out a story is an email contact with a public body's PR office.
 


West Hoathly Seagull

Honorary Ruffian
Aug 26, 2003
3,540
Sharpthorne/SW11
Before anybody posts that of course Tony Blair wouldn't like anything which might help get to the truth, that's not my point.

My point is that as far as I can see the FoA has not helped uncover loads of scandals. But scandals have still been uncovered by both good investigative journalism and leaks.

But what the FoA has done is to tie up loads of people in unnecessary demands for information.

I don't think it should be abolished but it does need amending.

It used to tie me up for a good day a week when I was the co-ordinator for our section for answering FOI requests. Most of them were trivial, such as how many people worked in such and such an area (I was in HR), and a good number of those asking for substantial information we couldn't answer anyway, such as how much a speaker was paid to address senior Civil Servants, as such information relates to an individual and is therefore confidential or exempt on the grounds of commercial confidentiality. Also, having to get bits of information from across the office added to the task and made it very difficult to meet the 20 day deadline (a large number of the requests had to be cleared by a Minister as well). I was on about £25,000 a year at the time, in other words my work cost the taxpayer £5,000 a year. Multiply that by however many staff across the office were doing the same and you'll see how much it cost. Again, not saying the FOI Act needs to be abolished, but it definitely needs reform.
 


Albumen

Don't wait for me!
Jan 19, 2010
11,495
Brighton - In your face
Good lord: if they remove this power, the Argus will surely fold. I can't imagine how they will fill their pages without having the chance to bombard public bodies with stupid requests about how many packets of biscuits they order annually.

Yep. Every third FOI at our office is from the Argus and we have to spend valuable time answering them as it's the law. And it's the Argus that blames us for wasting resources. The ****wits.
I'm all for transparency but the current law should be looked at.
 




Nibble

New member
Jan 3, 2007
19,238
Another reason for Tory voters to hang their heads in shame.
 






SAC

Well-known member
May 21, 2014
2,534
Without the act, how will we be able to check the difference between the quoted attendance and real attendance figures at the Amex?

Bloody Tories ruining our fun.
 



Paying the bills

Latest Discussions

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here