This tells you all you need to know about the BBC

alfredmizen

Banned

Mar 11, 2015

6,342

• Jul 2, 2015

• #1

They must remain impartial and ''fair'' to ISIS.



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...o-stop-using-term-islamic-state-10359806.html

 

Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash

Jul 6, 2003

70,139

• Jul 2, 2015

• #2

alfredmizen said:

They must remain impartial and ''fair'' to ISIS.



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...o-stop-using-term-islamic-state-10359806.html

Click to expand...

Maybe they should use Cameron's preferred term 'a poisonous death cult”. That might work.

 

Simster

"the man's an arse"

Jul 7, 2003

54,166

Surrey

• Jul 2, 2015

• #3

What are getting so uptight about FFS? Jesus wept.

 

Doc Lynam

I hate the Daily Mail

Jun 19, 2011

7,198

• Jul 2, 2015

• #4

Watched an interview on the BBC with the social film director Ken Loach and I think he was quite right when he said the BBC has changed its very pro big business but isn't interested in Unions you only have to watch Newsnight or Question Time to see this. Also it seems to be in this sickly love in with the royal family, why should I be interested in Elisabeth windsors views on the Tunisian massacre how is that news worthy?

 

KZNSeagull

Well-known member

Nov 26, 2007

19,792

Wolsingham, County Durham

• Jul 2, 2015

• #5

Yes, indeed. It tells me that they are still trying to remain the leader in world news reporting. They must remain impartial and fair to everyone and long may that continue.

 

Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash

Jul 6, 2003

70,139

• Jul 2, 2015

• #6

KZNSeagull said:

Yes, indeed. It tells me that they are still trying to remain the leader in world news reporting. They must remain impartial and fair to everyone and long may that continue.

Click to expand...

Quite. The alternative is that the BBC is the mouthpiece of the British government. Which is in nobody's interests. Other than the British government's. Obviously.

 

Lord Bracknell

On fire

Jul 5, 2003

39,499

104 Upper Grosvenor Street, Mayfair

• Jul 2, 2015

• #7

Listening today to Radio 4, it seems quite obvious to me that the BBC have taken on board the criticism and are now following the government directive not to refer to "Islamic State" without qualifying the phrase.

 

JCL666

absurdism

Sep 23, 2011

2,190

• Jul 2, 2015

• #8

Where does it actually say that the BBC have stated they "must be fair to ISIS"?


Click bait at it's worst

 

R

Rod Marsh

New member

Aug 9, 2013

1,254

Sussex

• Jul 2, 2015

• #9

I've worked at Reuters for 15 years now. Our organisation and journalists pride themselves on their impartiality. Surely everyone wants to read an unbiased account of what's going on??

 

Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Jul 11, 2003

59,467

The Fatherland

• Jul 2, 2015

• #10

Simster said:

What are getting so uptight about FFS? Jesus wept.

Click to expand...

Post-Muslim Tension?

 

Bladders

Twats everywhere

Jun 22, 2012

13,672

The Troubadour

• Jul 2, 2015

• #11

Simster said:

What are getting so uptight about FFS? Jesus wept.

Click to expand...

Does a lot of weeping that bloke..

 

alfredmizen

Banned

Mar 11, 2015

6,342

• Jul 2, 2015

• Thread starter
• #12

KZNSeagull said:

Yes, indeed. It tells me that they are still trying to remain the leader in world news reporting. They must remain impartial and fair to everyone and long may that continue.

Click to expand...

ISIS is an organisation that wants to destroy our way of life, it is at war with us, it has just killed 38 people in cold blood in Tunisia, would you have wanted them to remain impartial about the nazis ?

 

Diego Napier

Well-known member

Mar 27, 2010

4,416

• Jul 2, 2015

• #13

This tells you all you need to know about Bushy

 

KZNSeagull

Well-known member

Nov 26, 2007

19,792

Wolsingham, County Durham

• Jul 2, 2015

• #14

alfredmizen said:

ISIS is an organisation that wants to destroy our way of life, it is at war with us, it has just killed 38 people in cold blood in Tunisia, would you have wanted them to remain impartial about the nazis ?

Click to expand...

I would want them to report the facts so that we, the public, can make our own minds up. I do not want to be told what to think by anyone, thanks.

 

carlzeiss

Well-known member

May 19, 2009

5,843

Amazonia

• Jul 2, 2015

• #15

Can't see how even the BBC could be impartial when it comes to this type of behavior

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-Islamists-latest-sickening-executions.html

 

Gullflyinghigh

Registered User

Apr 23, 2012

4,279

• Jul 2, 2015

• #16

Godwin would be proud, 12th post.

Either way, I'm not sure it actually matters how the BBC want to refer to them as most people would hopefully be able to form their own opinions of them based on their actions.

 

alfredmizen

Banned

Mar 11, 2015

6,342

• Jul 2, 2015

• Thread starter
• #17

KZNSeagull said:

I would want them to report the facts so that we, the public, can make our own minds up. I do not want to be told what to think by anyone, thanks.

Click to expand...

It is reporting the facts , but i'd prefer an organisation that im forced to fvcking pay for to have a default position of being pro british( the clue is in the fvcking name ) and not so worried about ''being fair'' to our enemies, thanks.

 

alfredmizen

Banned

Mar 11, 2015

6,342

• Jul 2, 2015

• Thread starter
• #18

Diego Napier said:

This tells you all you need to know about Bushy

Click to expand...

Nothing you didnt know already , cockmuncher.

 

Simster

"the man's an arse"

Jul 7, 2003

54,166

Surrey

• Jul 2, 2015

• #19

You really will find any old shìt to be angry about.

 

Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati

Helpful Moderator

NSC Patron

Jul 23, 2003

34,089

Up and Coming Sunny Portslade

• Jul 2, 2015

• #20

You know, for once, you might be on to something. If we can only impose far more state control on our media coupled with a few random detentions based on suspicion then a lot of these Johnny Foreigners might think twice about coming to somewhere so similar to their barbaric homelands and, instead, try and turn Sweden in to the next Bangladesh, nappies and all.