Kim Jong Un v Jack Warner - Worlds Biggest #### Grand Final

pastafarian

Well-known member

Sep 4, 2011

11,902

Sussex

• Jun 8, 2015

• #1

Two of the worlds greatest `s go head to head for the biggest award

Kim should win easily with his clown efforts at running a country and his human rights abuse but has there ever been a bigger than Jack Warner in football

 

Pantani

Il Pirata

Dec 3, 2008

5,445

Newcastle

• Jun 8, 2015

• #2

Not really comparable are they.

Warner is an odious prick who has stolen a bunch of money.

Kim Jong Un is responsible for the oppression of millions and the deaths of thousands. Let's not get confused about the importance of football and some misspent Coca Cola sponsorship money.

 

pastafarian

Well-known member

Sep 4, 2011

11,902

Sussex

• Jun 8, 2015

• Thread starter
• #3

Pantani said:

Not really comparable are they.

Warner is an odious prick who has stolen a bunch of money.

Kim Jong Un is responsible for the oppression of millions and the deaths of thousands. Let's not get confused about the importance of football and some misspent Coca Cola sponsorship money.

Click to expand...

this is all true,but you need to think outside the box and think who is the biggest

 

Simster

"the man's an arse"

Jul 7, 2003

54,207

Surrey

• Jun 8, 2015

• #4

pastafarian said:

this is all true,but you need to think outside the box and think who is the biggest

Click to expand...

I'm struggling to look past [MENTION=12656]Pantani[/MENTION]'s blatantly sensible outlook. Sorry, shittest poll ever.

 

pastafarian

Well-known member

Sep 4, 2011

11,902

Sussex

• Jun 8, 2015

• Thread starter
• #5

Simster said:

I'm struggling to look past [MENTION=12656]Pantani[/MENTION]'s blatantly sensible outlook. Sorry, shittest poll ever.

Click to expand...

thats a bit harsh and hurtful

if warner wins will you eat your hat?

 

Simster

"the man's an arse"

Jul 7, 2003

54,207

Surrey

• Jun 8, 2015

• #6

pastafarian said:

thats a bit harsh and hurtful

if warner wins will you eat your hat?

Click to expand...

It is a bit harsh actually - sorry. There have been some DREADFUL polls posted on here to be honest.

 

Gullflyinghigh

Registered User

Apr 23, 2012

4,279

• Jun 8, 2015

• #7

Pantani said:

Not really comparable are they.

Warner is an odious prick who has stolen a bunch of money.

Kim Jong Un is responsible for the oppression of millions and the deaths of thousands. Let's not get confused about the importance of football and some misspent Coca Cola sponsorship money.

Click to expand...

Well, that pretty much says it all.

The only real positive for Kim Jong Un is that he'd probably lose this sort of poll if he was against his dad, not that I can imagine that being the case for too long.

 

Pavilionaire

Well-known member

Jul 7, 2003

30,583

• Jun 8, 2015

• #8

It's all relative. KJU was born into this North Korean Political System, although dysfunctional to us it is normal behaviour for him because it is the same way his father ruled before him.

On the other hand, Jack Warner took a global sport run benignly and has corrupted it beyond repair.

 

Triggaaar

Well-known member

Oct 24, 2005

50,202

Goldstone

• Jun 8, 2015

• #9

Pavilionaire said:

On the other hand, Jack Warner took a global sport run benignly and has corrupted it beyond repair.

Click to expand...

Out of interest, is JW more responsible for the corruption in FIFA than Sepp Tw@tter?

 

Pavilionaire

Well-known member

Jul 7, 2003

30,583

• Jun 8, 2015

• #10

Triggaaar said:

Out of interest, is JW more responsible for the corruption in FIFA than Sepp Tw@tter?

Click to expand...

The evidence that has come to light seems to show that Warner has take a personal involvement in the corruption and has been very "hands on". It remains to be seem to what extent Blatter personally gained financially, it might have been the power he craved rather than the cash.

 

Triggaaar

Well-known member

Oct 24, 2005

50,202

Goldstone

• Jun 8, 2015

• #11

Pavilionaire said:

The evidence that has come to light seems to show that Warner has take a personal involvement in the corruption and has been very "hands on". It remains to be seem to what extent Blatter personally gained financially, it might have been the power he craved rather than the cash.

Click to expand...

Even if Blatter wasn't profiting (ignoring the humungous salary he gave himself), the corruption in FIFA is blatantly obvious to everyone, and he has accepted that, which makes him at least as bad as anyone in my mind.

 

Pavilionaire

Well-known member

Jul 7, 2003

30,583

• Jun 8, 2015

• #12

Triggaaar said:

Even if Blatter wasn't profiting (ignoring the humungous salary he gave himself), the corruption in FIFA is blatantly obvious to everyone, and he has accepted that, which makes him at least as bad as anyone in my mind.

Click to expand...

I can't disagree with that but, for me, selling your vote to the highest bidder as Warner did with Morocco, Egypt and South Africa is extremely despicable. There's no legacy from the South African World Cup, just a lot of empty stadia falling into disrepair through minimal usage. What they'll do with the stadia in Qatar God / Allah only knows.