spanish flair
Well-known member
If true I hope we had a sell on clause in the deal when we sold him. Although, I can't see Leicester wanting to sell him, or why on earth would Ulloa want to go there?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Palace rumoured to be after Ulloa
- Thread starter spanish flair
- Start date
KZNSeagull
Well-known member
I'm pretty sure we would have a sell on clause. Is his family still in or around Brighton?
1234andcounting
Well-known member
- Mar 31, 2008
- 1,609
If they are, maybe we could take them hostage as Leo going there would be too much to bear after Murray.
Prince Monolulu
Everything in Moderation
If he were to subscribe to the Caravan Club, the words of his song might need to be adjusted somewhat.
There may be a bit more to it than that - Guillem Balague was talking about it on Twitter this morning, although according to him West Brom are also interested.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
There would be some sense to this rumour.
The family did not settle in Leicester (seemingly) and they live in Brighton and he goes to Leicester a couple of times a week to train.
So maybe he has said he wants to move South and if so, Palace would not be the worst fit, for him.
The family did not settle in Leicester (seemingly) and they live in Brighton and he goes to Leicester a couple of times a week to train.
So maybe he has said he wants to move South and if so, Palace would not be the worst fit, for him.
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Perhaps we could end up with the entire Palace team living in Brighton?
gripper stebson
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2004
- 6,657
Would be a fair amount of irony in Palace replacing Murray with Ulloa!!
Norman Baker suck my lozenge
New member
Just know that if he joins them slags him and Murray will score for giggles and shits.
Mackenzie
Old Brightonian
Palace would obviously be interested, he's far better than anything else they've got, plus they've done alright with our rejects in the past.
Yes I can see this having some substance.
Yes I can see this having some substance.
I’ve not seen this rumour anywhere else. Type in Leicester and you just get stuff about the Thai orgy!
13 goals in a season isn’t bad but not enough to increase his value from the £8 million paid by Leicester therefore there would be no sell on fee to pass on.
13 goals in a season isn’t bad but not enough to increase his value from the £8 million paid by Leicester therefore there would be no sell on fee to pass on.
Agreed. Would be a perfect move for him - not to mention ncs putting 2&2 together suggesting this frees up glen to return. Only problem with the sell on is it take a £15m fee for us to just get £1m, assuming its a 20% deal.
I have never heard of the 2nd type, must make it very difficult to sell a player if the buying club has to fork out extra to the previous club.
spanish flair
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #17
Seeing as now his fee has risen to £10 million to us, I can't see them selling him for anything less than £15m.
In the case of the 2nd type the fee to the previous club would be paid by the selling club out of whatever they receive rather than the buying one, of course that could result in an increased fee being asked to 'cover their losses' as it were.
I tend to agree though that it's far more likely to be of the first kind if there is one at all (and of course this is only relevant if he actually moves anywhere).
In The Rough
New member
Ulloa on the move....
http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/...Brighton-ace/story-26611090-detail/story.html
Would do a job up front with Murray
http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/...Brighton-ace/story-26611090-detail/story.html
Would do a job up front with Murray
glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
God this might sound like really bad news
sell on fee
maybe we could waive that and take FFS off their hands
this board would go into meltdown
sell on fee
maybe we could waive that and take FFS off their hands
this board would go into meltdown