Jerome Sinclair (18 Year old Striker)

burnee54

East Upper Hermit

Sep 1, 2011

1,150

up the downs

• May 13, 2015

• #1

The Times (today)
"Liverpool have opened contract talks with Jerome Sinclair, but are ready to let the highly-rated teenager go out on loan next season as they prepare for the anticipated arrival of Danny Ings.
Despite competition from several clubs, notably Manchester United and Real Sociedad, Liverpool are expected to sign Ings from Burnley when his contract expires next month, with the fee to be determined by tribunal if the clubs are unable to reach an agreement.
The acquisition of Ings would allow Sinclair, 18, to join a club in either the Barclays Premier League or the Sky Bet Championship, in keeping with Brendan Rodgers’s desire for the forward to play regular first-team football before returning to Liverpool. There is even a possibility that Sinclair could be used as a makeweight in any deal to take Ings to Anfield, particularly as that would prevent the need for a tribunal."

Highly Rated 18 Year old Striker?
Do you think Brendan would let us have a go on him for a season?
Or do you think he is still upset that we broke the last one he lent us?

 

spence

British and Proud

Oct 15, 2014

9,814

Crawley

• May 13, 2015

• #2

I want our own striker(s)

 

Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat

Aug 18, 2009

65,440

Beside the seaside, beside the sea

• May 13, 2015

• #3

Teixeira broke himself with a wild challenge, but I think that loan came about because of Hyypia's relationship with Liverpool.

 

Blackadder

Brighton Bhuna Boy

Jul 6, 2003

16,077

Haywards Heath

• May 13, 2015

• #4

Thunder Bolt said:

Teixeira broke himself with a wild challenge, but I think that loan came about because of Hyypia's relationship with Liverpool.

Click to expand...

This 100%

 

Lurchy

Well-known member

Jul 2, 2014

2,350

• May 13, 2015

• #5

Club needs at least two experienced strikers who are used to scoring goals, unless Sinclair was an amazing talent would rather Tilley took that place on the bench / fringes of the first team.

 

Hyperion

New member

Nov 1, 2010

5,314

• May 14, 2015

• #6

[/QUOTE]
Do you think Brendan would let us have a go on him for a season?
[/QUOTE]



JEEEEESUS CHRIIIST

I think you'll need some consent from Mr Sinclair first

 

Pintos

Well-known member

Jul 28, 2005

560

Oxted

• May 14, 2015

• #7

We don't need him, we've got Colunga coming back

 

Albion Robster

Well-known member

Jul 21, 2003

2,421

North West

• May 14, 2015

• #8

Sinclair has scored a lot of goals for LFC's Under 21's team this season. Went on loan to Wigan for the last month of the season.
Personally don't think he's the striker Hughton will be looking for.

 

lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969

Jun 11, 2011

13,716

Worthing

• May 14, 2015

• #9

We wouldn't sing him, , he's never played for us before

 

G

Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull

May 22, 2012

14,841

• May 14, 2015

• #10

burnee54 said:

The Times (today)
"Liverpool have opened contract talks with Jerome Sinclair, but are ready to let the highly-rated teenager go out on loan next season as they prepare for the anticipated arrival of Danny Ings.
Despite competition from several clubs, notably Manchester United and Real Sociedad, Liverpool are expected to sign Ings from Burnley when his contract expires next month, with the fee to be determined by tribunal if the clubs are unable to reach an agreement.
The acquisition of Ings would allow Sinclair, 18, to join a club in either the Barclays Premier League or the Sky Bet Championship, in keeping with Brendan Rodgers’s desire for the forward to play regular first-team football before returning to Liverpool. There is even a possibility that Sinclair could be used as a makeweight in any deal to take Ings to Anfield, particularly as that would prevent the need for a tribunal."

Highly Rated 18 Year old Striker?
Do you think Brendan would let us have a go on him for a season?
Or do you think he is still upset that we broke the last one he lent us?

Click to expand...

Not sure about this Sinclair fella, to be honest, but I think we need some proven championship (or, ideally Premier League) experience. Sod it, any kind of experience! Having said that, the shower that were up front fit that bill and look what happened there

But that's not what caught my eye about this.

Without wishing to de-rail the thread – and no disrespect to the player – why are Liverpool taking on Ings? Surely they need to be "splashing the cash" on a "statement of intent" striker?

And why, if Ings is out of contract at the end of the season, would Liverpool have to agree with Burnley, or use a player as a 'makeweight' in the deal?

 

GT49er

Well-known member

Feb 1, 2009

46,716

Gloucester

• May 14, 2015

• #11

Yes please, we'll take him, and can he please bring Tex along to keep him company too?

 

H

Husty

Mooderator

Oct 18, 2008

11,991

• May 14, 2015

• #12

lawros left foot said:

We wouldn't sing him, , he's never played for us before

Click to expand...

Neither had vincentelot, owen or heskey and those transfers were all a resounding success.