Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Blackpool are RICH beyond their wildest dreams



ElectricNaz

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2013
838
Hampshire
But money doesn't equal happiness. They should be applauded I suppose for managing to post that profit, have a miniscule wage bill and still managing to avoid relegation last season. However it's beyond me why they didn't spend anything in the summer on the back of that? Especially given that this season they are still getting parachute payments at the same level of last season I think. They should've outbid leicester for Ulloa...

Also interesting is that they are loaning their operating company money and are owed over £27million now. Anyone with any more info on that, is that for tax purposes or something? (EDIT: Just actually read the article)

The embattled club, whose relegation to League One will be confirmed within weeks, have just posted profits of £9.45m for the last financial year.

Pre-tax figures for the year up the end of May 2014 showed an increase in profits from £5.9m in 2013.


This came despite a fall in turnover at Bloomfield Road from £22m to £18m, while ‘parachute payments’ still being received as a result of the club’s Premier League season (2010-11) dropped from £14.2m to £12m.


These reductions were offset by transfer income, including the sale of Matt Phillips to QPR for £3.5m, and by a drop in football-related expenditure, such as player wages and transfer fees, from £9.84m to £8.4m.

Gate receipts, programme sales, merchandise and bar and food sales all fell over the 12-month period.

Loans from Blackpool Football Club Limited to the club’s operating company, Segesta Limited, increased from £23.7m to £27.7m.

Directors’ payments fell from £568,024 to £69,471. The highest-paid director received £44,000 in the latest accounts, compared to £542,562 in the previous ones.


These financial results are unlikely to spark the same level of controversy as those for 2010-11, which included an £11m payment to club owner Owen Oyston.

But they will do little to silence critical fans, who want chairman Karl Oyston to invest more in a team that is bottom of the Championship and certain to be playing League One football next year.

The chairman was yesterday unavailable for comment. But in a wide-ranging interview with The Gazette in October, owner Owen Oyston defended the club’s position four years on from their money-spinning promotion to the Premier League.

He said: “It’s simply not true we have asset-stripped or misappropriated football-generated funds.



“We are one of the few clubs in the football world that have no debts and are in profit.”

Asked about the club’s estimated £90m windfall from the Premier League campaign and the subsequent parachute payments, Oyston said £47.6m had been spent (between 2010-13) on players’ wages, bonuses and transfer fees.

The owner added that the £11m paid to himself was to reimburse him for money invested in the club since he took over in 1987, and that the £23.7m moved from BFC to other Oyston companies was used to pay for stands, units within the stands and hotel developments.

He said much of the other Premier League money had gone on ground maintenance and staff wages.

The latest accounts posted at Companies House showed that the club paid a corporation tax bill of £2.1m.
 




The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,383
Running at a profit, investing nothing and falling down the leagues dramatically - sounds like the work of a poisonous, blood sucking chairman to me.
 


Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
How did the legal prosecutions of internet posters by Blackpool FC go ?
 




brightn'ove

cringe
Apr 12, 2011
9,137
London
"He said much of the other Premier League money had gone on ground maintenance and staff wages."

This tells you all you need to know about Oyston. One look at their pitch will tell you they haven't spent a single penny on 'ground maintenance'.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here