Leeds were massively flattered by that scoreline.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
How many should we have won by?
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 20,957
I can't understand how they won versus 'boro as they seemed completely unable to defend.
The Fifth Column
Retired ex-cop
5-0 would have been about right I think. Dirty Leeds back 4 were static and very immobile.
Should have been 3-0 up at halftime.
Tex's header, the goal, the pass through to CMS.
If we were I doubt we would have been treated to such a second half.
Tex's header, the goal, the pass through to CMS.
If we were I doubt we would have been treated to such a second half.
nicko31
Well-known member
Been a few smash and grabs by Leeds of late, finally their luck has run out and their owner has also decided not to come back after April
Hyperion
New member
- Nov 1, 2010
- 5,314
Spot on. We tore Leeds' defence a new one. A few seasons back that would have been a real pasting
pottert
New member
Should have been 3.0 at halt time & we should have scored at least 3 in 2nd half.
CMS passed when he should have shot & vice versa.
We hit the bar,hit the post.
Leeds were the poorest team I have seen at the Amex this season.
CMS passed when he should have shot & vice versa.
We hit the bar,hit the post.
Leeds were the poorest team I have seen at the Amex this season.
BrianWade4
Well-known member
5 is fair
8 was possible
8 was possible
I'm not having that.
Leeds were playing the best attacking Albion side in at least 18 months, who decided the should defend well too.
T soprano
New member
Hand ball!!!!!!
scooter1
How soon is now?
6...
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Apparently, Silvestri was outstanding in that game, saving everything.
Oh, and 6.
I thought they were one of the better sides, and far FAR better than Birmingham. But we played WELL for once.