saafend_seagull
Well-known member
He just bubbled 100k poker Torno in Australia
He's doing ok in 10k main event though...
He's doing ok in 10k main event though...
He just bubbled 100k poker Torno in Australia
He's doing ok in 10k main event though...
Not quite the legendary "soapy tit **** ".Love your second tab! ;-)
Should have folded after the first re raise and later when any two big hearts would have done his flush post flop ignoring full house.
Should have folded after the first re raise and later when any two big hearts would have done his flush post flop ignoring full house.
Should have folded after the first re raise and later when any two big hearts would have done his flush post flop ignoring full house.
Actually, no. You wouldn't fold to a re-raise because of ranges from the big blind. What Bloom should have done was bet the turn, had Schemion called he'd know Schemion's setting a trap due to the pre flop re raise then check call on the flop. Bloom should have guessed the likelihood that Schemion has hit the board is high. Bloom should have checked behind on the flop, CO v BB means ranges are slightly wider and therefore, Bloom's behind most of the time.
Of course, what Bloom's thinking about is 2 factors 1) Bubble play, people can be looser here because people tighten up to ensure they make the cash, 2) Expected Value of a flush over straight.
The board was wetter than the atlantic ocean, Bloom did fine until the turn, where he should have min bet to gauge where he stands in the hand then fold to any re raise and then fold to any river bet. Which Ole is likely to do because once he has made his full house.
Quite, I like Bloom's pre-flop play here. He's got in with a hand he clearly likes, representing something completely different. He can put his opponent on a smallish range of hands (admittedly I think AQ unsuited is probably just about in that range), his opponent is deep stacked so the expected value here is lovely. He should know when to put this one down (he plays this sort of hand successfully enough normally.)
You post flop analysis is spot on. That bet on the flop really isn't a good one and he's a bit lost in the hand when it's called - it's told him nothing else about what he's up against.
Subject to the usual caveats on analysing a single poker hand when you don't know how the players had been playing previously.
The shove on the river makes virtually no sense.