That Noah Blockbuster Film "massive spoiler alert "

pastafarian

Well-known member

Sep 4, 2011

11,902

Sussex

• Jul 30, 2014

• #1

Anyone seen it?

I remember a few months back when it was in the cinemas,Religious groups moaning how inaccurate it was.
I did think at the time crikey these people moan about everything.The Noah story is the Noah story,its impossible to mess up.

Having seen it last night,i couldnt have been more wrong.
This may possibly the worst inaccurate interpretation of a story by hollywood scriptwriters in the history of film........EVER!

By the end i was half expecting Lassie to appear barking "land ahoy"

 

Kikikaikai

Charlatan?

May 20, 2014

139

Brighton

• Jul 30, 2014

• #2

Personally i think it is a hurrendous movie, that's 2 hours of my life i will never get back

 

Return of the Rev

Well-known member

Nov 26, 2008

21,045

Flitting between the county league and mates rates

• Jul 30, 2014

• #3

Did it rain in the end?

 

Black Rod

Well-known member

Jan 19, 2013

948

• Jul 30, 2014

• #4

It's got Emma Watson in it. What is not to like?

 

CorgiRegisteredFriend

Well-known member

May 29, 2011

8,317

Boring By Sea

• Jul 30, 2014

• #5

I am not an expert on the bible and I have not seen the film but someone said there was a stowaway on the ark amongst other inaccuracies.

 

Puppet Master

non sequitur

Aug 14, 2012

4,055

• Jul 30, 2014

• #6

CorgiRegisteredFriend said:

I am not an expert on the bible and I have not seen the film but someone said there was a stowaway on the ark amongst other inaccuracies.

Click to expand...

Spoilers much?

 

Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Jul 6, 2003

42,817

Lancing

• Jul 30, 2014

• #7

I thought it was great. Only beaten at the cinema this year by Maleficent

 

pastafarian

Well-known member

Sep 4, 2011

11,902

Sussex

• Jul 30, 2014

• Thread starter
• #8

Black Rod said:

It's got Emma Watson in it. What is not to like?

Click to expand...

i actually quite enjoyed the film,even though it completely takes the P@ss.

it may have had something to do with the fact you can see an ever so quick flash of Emmas boobies at 1hr 10 mins 47 secs

 

Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Jul 6, 2003

42,817

Lancing

• Jul 30, 2014

• #9

For me when I pay £ 10 to see a film I always try and find something enjoyable in it and nearly always do. It seems a lot of people go to a film determined to hate it and find fault in it. Most odd

 

Hyperion

New member

Nov 1, 2010

5,314

• Jul 30, 2014

• #10

Looked shocking in the trailers. Wtf would have anyone bothered?

Hollywood is producing some real tripe in vast quantity at the moment

 

Tyrone Biggums

Well-known member

Jun 25, 2006

13,498

Geelong, Australia

• Jul 30, 2014

• #11

As with Titanic I refuse to pay good money to see rubbish films I already know the ending too.

 

Puppet Master

non sequitur

Aug 14, 2012

4,055

• Jul 30, 2014

• #12

Uncle Spielberg said:

I thought it was great. Only beaten at the cinema this year by Maleficent

Click to expand...

Enjoyed that too Unc but for me, top two films this year at the flicks has been Godzilla and Planet of the Rapes

 

Return of the Rev

Well-known member

Nov 26, 2008

21,045

Flitting between the county league and mates rates

• Jul 30, 2014

• #13

Its on sky movies aleady I THINK.

 

Tom Bombadil

Well-known member

Jul 14, 2003

6,033

Jibrovia

• Jul 30, 2014

• #14

As the bible version is just a rehash of earlier flood myths I'm not sure you can be too sniffy about accuracy.

 

pastafarian

Well-known member

Sep 4, 2011

11,902

Sussex

• Jul 30, 2014

• Thread starter
• #15

Tyrone Biggums said:

As with Titanic I refuse to pay good money to see rubbish films I already know the ending too.

Click to expand...

how odd
what about the shit films that you dont know the ending too

 

pastafarian

Well-known member

Sep 4, 2011

11,902

Sussex

• Jul 30, 2014

• Thread starter
• #16

Tyrone Biggums said:

As with Titanic I refuse to pay good money to see rubbish films I already know the ending too.

Click to expand...

I dont think you quite get it do you.

how do you know the ending to this film,when its wildly inaccurate,without seeing it?

 

GOM

living vicariously

Aug 8, 2005

3,225

Leeds - but not the dirty bit

• Jul 30, 2014

• #17

Return of the Rev said:

Did it rain in the end?

Click to expand...

Spoiler Alert !!!!!!






No, in the end it stopped raining

 

withdeanwombat

Well-known member

Feb 17, 2005

8,698

Somersetshire

• Jul 30, 2014

• #18

Voroshilov said:

As the bible version is just a rehash of earlier flood myths I'm not sure you can be too sniffy about accuracy.

Click to expand...

Oh for goodness sake. Another thread ruined by the truth.

 

Bladders

Twats everywhere

Jun 22, 2012

13,672

The Troubadour

• Jul 30, 2014

• #19

As soon as I heard Ray Bet365 voice in the trailer, I knew it wasn't for me...

 

Bevendean Hillbilly

New member

Sep 4, 2006

12,805

Nestling in green nowhere

• Jul 30, 2014

• #20

How can it be "inaccurate" when the original story is a load of cobblers? There is a very funny article somewhere online where a mathematics professor works out the size of vessel needed to carry two of every creature on earth and deal with feed, waste and water for them all. The ark would have to dwarf the biggest aircraft carrier in the world and was built, apparently, by a couple of Arabs using gopher wood.