Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

The Big Club Theorem (part deux)



Brighton TID

New member
Jul 24, 2005
1,741
Horsham
We have heard a lot of chat asking how big our club really is, and how big this or that club is in comparison. Now, to stop all these arguments, I have devised the Big Club Theorem thus:

The Big Club Theorem:

Big Club Rating = [Current ground capacity x club age x (1 + FA Cup final appearances + European Cup final appearances + UEFA Cup final appearances)] / 1000000

Here are a few notable Big Club Ratings including ourselves shown below. You will note that Barnsley have a slightly higher rating than us, based probably on one more cup final appearance (all figures from Wiki). Also, interesting to see that Chelsea and Spurs have similar ratings.

Man Utd: [75731 x 136 x (1 + 18 + 5 + 0)] / 1000000 = 247.2
Arsenal: [60338 x 128 x (1 + 18 + 1 + 0)] / 1000000 = 154.5
Liverpool: [45276 x 122 x (1 + 14 + 7 + 3)] / 1000000 = 138.1
Chelsea: [41837 x 109 x (1 + 11 + 2 + 1)] / 1000000 = 68.4
Spurs: [36284 x 131 x (1 + 9 + 0 + 3)] / 1000000 = 61.8
Barnsley: [23009 x 127 x (1 + 2 + 0 + 0)] /1000000 = 8.8
BHA: [30750 x 113 x (1 + 1 + 0 + 0)] / 1000000 = 7.0

In future, don’t muck about, if you need to find out if one club is bigger than another, use the Big Club Theorem.
 






sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
12,506
Hove
Any judgement of a club's (current) 'bigness' really needs to ignore ancient history.
 


Brighton TID

New member
Jul 24, 2005
1,741
Horsham
So we are the seventh biggest club in England?

No these are just a few notable examples of teams. Barnsley are there because of O Grady's comments a few weeks back. Transpires that Barnsley are 'bigger' than us, as proved by the theorem.
 










Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Any theory that suggests Barnsley are bigger than the mighty Brighton and Hove Albion is clearly a rubbish theory. COG has already covered that one :thumbsup:
 












D'Angelo Saxon

SW19ULLS
Jul 30, 2004
3,097
SW19
I think you need to factor in all trophies won (definitely not at the same points value though - all should carry different weight).
 








sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
12,506
Hove
Disagree, these are fundamental variables in the theorem.

History can say whether a club WAS 'big', not whether it IS 'big'.

Glories from over a century ago are not really relevant when judging the current status, but have a great place when commenting on a club's history.
 




father_and_son

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2012
4,646
Under the Police Box
There should be an "aging" scalar associated with each of the final appearances.

I would suggest this should be something like (0.98) ^ (Years Ago - 1).

So an FA Cup final, say, 6 years ago carries ~90% of the weight of last season's, something 19 Years ago would be ~70% as important, 35 years ago is ~50%, etc.
 


Notters

Well-known member
Oct 20, 2003
24,869
Guiseley
This has been done before with much more complicated formula. You need to take into account the Southern League, the relative importance of different cups through the years, the "recentness" of different achievements, etc. I'd also say ground capacity is irrelevant... Look at the mighty Queens Park:

queenspark20.jpg

I'm not convinced the age of a club is relevant either, certainly not a big factor.

Obviously it's completely subjective though, which makes all that I and everyone says irrelevant.
 




Gullflyinghigh

Registered User
Apr 23, 2012
4,279
Poopsville, may need to amend the theorem
It should include all title wins, with relevant weightings for each league.

Top title wins are all well and good but many clubs don't have one (nor any major trophy), so outside those that do you'll need a few tie-breakers...also, where's the League Cup and Johnstones Trophy?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here