Munchkin
Well-known member
Ulloa and CMS sold, 5 mil in the bank and Zamora and Murray starting up top against Sheffield Wednesday on the opening day of the season ?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Would you be happy with....
- Thread starter Munchkin
- Start date
Bladders
Twats everywhere
What do you know.
Norman Potting
Well-known member
No. I prefer to remember Zamora, and to a lesser extent, Murray for the good times. Coming back doen't usually work out, only if you are Gary Hart!
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
Crofty?
supaseagull
Well-known member
CMS and Leo sold for £5 mil. I would be pretty pee'd off regardless of who we signed
Prince Monolulu
Everything in Moderation
Why would we want to buy TWO busted flushes?
Mo Gosfield
Well-known member
- Aug 11, 2010
- 6,284
Zamora would not fulfill initial expectations. He is now going over the top as a player and anyway is going to stay at QPR for his last big pay year. Lets remember him for what he did more than a decade ago.
Murray is fresher in the memory and will not be universally welcomed. Good player, who can lead the line. Good in the air ( particularly defensively ) so decent replacement, if Ulloa went. Spends about the same time on the floor as Ulloa, so no change there! Personally, I'd have him back but others may think differently.
Murray is fresher in the memory and will not be universally welcomed. Good player, who can lead the line. Good in the air ( particularly defensively ) so decent replacement, if Ulloa went. Spends about the same time on the floor as Ulloa, so no change there! Personally, I'd have him back but others may think differently.
I think you will find he means both CMS and Ulloa both sold and replaced with Murray and Zamora and 5 mill in the bank . Well that's how i read it
I am guessing the OP meant that the £5m was profit, the remaining transfer funds having been spent on Zamora salary & Murray transfer fee/salary?
Edit: already answered.
Last edited:
Your initial post was very clear. £5m would be the change (net cash gain) on transfer fees following the 2 ins and 2 outs.
And wages were NOT part of your point.
The Legend that IS Lawro
It's 'canard' Del
In direct response to the OP's question, I would be extremely disappointed but thankfully it will not happen
Seasider78
Well-known member
- Nov 14, 2004
- 5,937
The issue here would be injuries as Zamora is frequently on the sidelines and wonder how much Murray's knee injury has impacted his game as never the same after that. If Murray was fit would take him back as I think he offers the same threat as ulloa but for me was far better at linking play and bringing others into the game
Last edited:
- Jan 3, 2012
- 16,582
No - not particularly.
Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 14,847
No.
Why the obsession with BZ? There are a few other strikers around - many of whom are far better, cheaper (wages) and less injury prone than BZ. Move on now gang.
227 BHA
Well-known member
Murray and CMS starting against Wednesday and a few £mill in the bank and now your talking!
Not entirely unrealistic either
Not entirely unrealistic either
