Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[TV] What is up with the host production from the Brasil



SeagullSarge

Active member
Jul 8, 2012
227
Absolutely hideous production by HBS at the World Cup... not replaying enough of the play and when they do its super slow motion footage of players shouting of crowd shots, using goal line technology to show a goal when the ball has hit the back netting, poor camera grading and drifting colours, poor sound from the stadiums not picking up enough stadium fx's (must be scared a vuvusala (or however you spell that!)...

Even the BBC commentators are getting frustrated but it...

At least Van Persie goal was sheer quality!!!!
 




Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
19,782
Playing snooker
I'm just surprised how many empty seats there are.

Likewise. Spain vs. Holland in the World Cup finals on a Friday night and empty seats all over the place. It's poor. Host the World Cup in Europe every four years and end this shambles.

I'd have LOVED it had this World Cup been played in Italy, Spain, France or Germany.
 


Washie

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
5,419
Eastbourne
Likewise. Spain vs. Holland in the World Cup finals on a Friday night and empty seats all over the place. It's poor. Host the World Cup in Europe every four years and end this shambles.

I'd have LOVED it had this World Cup been played in Italy, Spain, France or Germany.

Unfortunately, the next two will be even worse.
 


vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,867
Seems fine to me, apart from the ridiculous graphic of a ball rolling over the goal line 5 minutes after a goal is scored.
 




vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,867
I'm more cheesed off with the ridiculous mass goal celebrations involving all the subs, back room staff, physios, tea makers, kit men, coach drivers and clip board holders on the touchline.
 




seagull_in_malaysia

Active member
Aug 18, 2006
910
Reading
Likewise. Spain vs. Holland in the World Cup finals on a Friday night and empty seats all over the place. It's poor. Host the World Cup in Europe every four years and end this shambles.

I'd have LOVED it had this World Cup been played in Italy, Spain, France or Germany.

Well, that would be a bit unfair. You've got the Euro championship for that instead.
 




Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patreon
Nov 15, 2008
31,765
Brighton
Absolutely hideous production by HBS at the World Cup... not replaying enough of the play and when they do its super slow motion footage of players shouting of crowd shots, using goal line technology to show a goal when the ball has hit the back netting, poor camera grading and drifting colours, poor sound from the stadiums not picking up enough stadium fx's (must be scared a vuvusala (or however you spell that!)...

Even the BBC commentators are getting frustrated but it...

At least Van Persie goal was sheer quality!!!!

That is really annoying me. Though, Sky did it last season. There was, I think, 2 incidents in which goal line technology was actually important, yet they tried to use it at least once every weekend, for incidents that were clearly either a goal and everyone knew it, or it didn't come close to crossing the line and no one claimed otherwise.
 


Leighgull

New member
Dec 27, 2012
2,377
What did we expect? The TV crews are ALL Americans used to crowd shots and mass high fives on the benches because the "action" on the pitch is so ****ing dull.

If you're used to filming the NFL or the fricking rounders the pace of soccer must give them nosebleeds.
 


Feb 9, 2011
1,047
Lancing
I'm more cheesed off with the ridiculous mass goal celebrations involving all the subs, back room staff, physios, tea makers, kit men, coach drivers and clip board holders on the touchline.



and me
 




Juan Albion

Chicken Sniffer 3rd Class
What did we expect? The TV crews are ALL Americans used to crowd shots and mass high fives on the benches because the "action" on the pitch is so ****ing dull.

If you're used to filming the NFL or the fricking rounders the pace of soccer must give them nosebleeds.

Ignorant post.
 








SeagullSarge

Active member
Jul 8, 2012
227
What did we expect? The TV crews are ALL Americans used to crowd shots and mass high fives on the benches because the "action" on the pitch is so ****ing dull.

If you're used to filming the NFL or the fricking rounders the pace of soccer must give them nosebleeds.

Agreed... They are just not used to the World Series of Socher are they ;-) I actually spent some time (well 2 months) in 2010 working on the production at the World Cup, I don't remember the coverage being as sketchy then but I guess they have some new toys to play with this time on the coverage.. They have a whole multitude of nationalities working on the host broadcast but they do have four years to get used to things between tournaments, I hate to say it but they really could do with taking a leaf out of Sky's book, they do know how to cover a match effectively
 


Dan Aitch

New member
May 31, 2013
2,287
Blaming the NFL for the inability of a cameraman or Director is like blaming your shoes for your socks being the wrong colour. It makes you look like an ill-informed dic... er, look 'a bit limited in your outlook'. Probably.

Or not.
 


Leighgull

New member
Dec 27, 2012
2,377
Blaming the NFL for the inability of a cameraman or Director is like blaming your shoes for your socks being the wrong colour. It makes you look like an ill-informed dic... er, look 'a bit limited in your outlook'. Probably.

Or not.

Does it? The NFL is DULL. Anyone who has ever watched it can see that. Americans don't go go watch the game, they go to eat enormous hotdogs and laze about for hours. It's shit.its totally bone. NBA? Netball for men. Shit game. Baseball? Rounders. Utter Bellend.

The games are tedious and full of commercials. Letting crews used to that dross is like asking camera men who normally shoot low budget porn movies with slow mo shots of jizz spurting all over some bird to produce an epic like Lawrence of Arabia.

There's always loads of NFL apologists and assorted liggers on who buy all that yank nonsense. They're wrong...you're wrong. Just WATCH THE COVERAGE and think on.

There's a good reason that American sports aren't p,aged anywher else...it's because they're totally pony.
 


Dan Aitch

New member
May 31, 2013
2,287
Does it? The NFL is DULL. Anyone who gas ever watched it can see that. Americans don't go o watch the game, they go to eat enormous hotdogs and laze about for hours. It's shit.bits totally bone. NBA? Netball for men. Shit game. Baseball? Rounders. Utter Bellend.

The games are tedious and full of commercials. Letting crews used to that dross is like asking camera men who normally shoot low budget porn movies with slow mo shots of jizz spurting all over some bird to produce an epic like Lawrence of Arabia.

There's always loads of NFL apologists and assorted liggers on who buy all that yank nonsense. They're wrong...you're wrong. Just WATCH THE COVERAGE and think on.

If only I'd had your enlightened and all-encompassing view to put me on the straight and narrow years ago.

Incidentally, at which point is it that you took my comment to be defending the NFL as opposed to defending NFL camera operators?

I love the NFL but your inability to understand what I initially said is a bit like blaming your shoes for your socks being the wrong colour. It makes you look... hang on - déjà vu.

ps In my opinion, you're quote biased and quite prejudiced against sports that aren't doing anything to massively encroach upon your life. Wouldn't it be easier to just calm down a bit, or not act so aggressively? No?

Fair enough. Have fun.
 






Javeaseagull

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2014
2,475
Somehow Michel Platini has become the devil incarnate for being against goal line technology. Not for me. After watching the Collinni masterclass on Sky TV I am a convert along with Graeme Souness and Jamie Carragher for the 5th official on the goal line. He gives much more assistance to the ref than a very expensive system that only tells us the ball has crossed the line.
The system is 30,000 plus pounds to install and at least 7,000 pounds PER Game to run. It was used 3 times last season only one of them was controversial.
The Premiership is the only league that is awash with money. That is the real reason that Platini is against it's implementation. You never get the truth in the English press. Platini is more than happy for us to have it he just doesn't want it imposed on the rest of Europe. Seems fair enough to me.
 



Paying the bills

Latest Discussions

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here