burger stalls

Tom Hark said:

Times change. Cheapo protective mats can be laid down, as they doubtless will be for Rod Stewart on the hallowed Amex pitch. The Uni might well welcome the chance to swell their coffers. As they do with the car parking.

Don't really care overly either way, just think the club are missing a major trick.

Click to expand...

The Large One said:

Of course, none of this has occurred to them...

Click to expand...

The Large One said:

The planning restrictions for catering were self-imposed. Once they're in place, they still have to make a case for them not being there. Have they tried? Don't know.

Click to expand...

aliakbanrafsanjali said:

I think we missed a trick with our planning of the stadium!

Click to expand...

Tom Hark said:

Click to expand...

The Large One said:

What, you think there's a discrepancy in those two statements?

The first comment was about the land over for which they are responsible. It was a planning condition they said they suggested themselves. Is it reversible? Probably, but then they did say they made a promise to their neighbours. Can the neighbours be persuaded to re-consider? Who knows?

But then you brought in a separate argument for something the club has no control over - the University of Brighton field. You're blaming the club for 'missing a major trick', as if you know they haven't tried to these avenues. Just maybe it's '... the club is being denied a trick...'?

Click to expand...

Tom Hark said:

Well, y'know, you say 'None of this has occurred to them...' inferring they're considered and discounted it and you also say 'Have they tried? Don't know'. As the bloke with the heavy case said, I rest my case

Click to expand...